Search results

They pick us to finish 5-3 in conference and also to go to Quick Lane? While they pick uva whom they think we'll beat to go to Belk? It's a waste of good spaghetti they seem to be throwing against the wall.

Not if, you know, you're a fan.

... and not fully appreciated even by our coach. I know that CPJ loves and appreciates our walk-ons, but I'm not sure that he fully or entirely appreciates their situation among our hundred plus players. This past week he made a joke about how unlikely it would be to have a RS Senior walk-on...

thanks anyway, @UConnJacket

Appreciate you, TaQuon. ... and I don't blame you for Total Quality Management and the disgust I feel every time I see the initials TQM.

I appreciate your optimism, but I'm not ready to start looking forward to next season. Tomorrow is Senior Day. Obviously, TaQuon will start and should. Whether our plan to defeat Bronco's D includes playing more of Tobias is to be determined. I can see it going that way. The Senior Day...

His last name is Hurley. That's enough. (though I hate how much Jose's game reminds me of his brother's)

What does the word, "analysis," mean here? Is it just a fun way of saying your guess based on observations or do you actually have an analytical method? No worries either way, but I like, am interested in, differing analytical approaches to predicting outcomes.

Thanks for the response. OK, let's start with the basics: we agree that there is no perfect ranking. Of course there's going to be controversy about ranking, and that's part of the fun. In a game, you can crown the winner. In a tournament, you can crown a champion. However, when you look to...

Some wahoo really wanted to go.

Beat them like they were dogs ...

Check your facts

OK, for some reason you are just trolling. Not cool.

I think you may be the only person I've encountered who thinks that football coaches have a primary plan for winning games that does not boil down to their offense scoring more than their defense allows. You saying that scoring more points than you allow is no more related to winning than...

I'm really not sure that you do get my drift. Your whole first paragraph is defending stats related to the "object of the game" but then reject points/drive scored and allowed, which are also directly related to the object of the game, as my previous post tried to explain. Yet, you still make...

First of all, your last question reflects something that has come up previously in your posts which may lie at the root of the disagreement: you're arguing, in part, against "stats" in the abstract. Unfortunately, you don't seem to recognize that it is contradicting your first sentence as well...

You forgot to clarify that when explaining the 3 elements of the triple option they will show video clips with fancy overlay graphics of plays that aren't actually triple option.

It's correlated for years. The object of the game is to win by scoring more points than you allow. If two teams play the same opponent and team A wins by 3pts and team B wins by 21, most people would conclude that generally speaking Team B is probably better than Team A. Your "logic" demands...

This post ignores the possibility that sometimes guys play poorly and some Ds are good. We played poorly against Pitt and Duke. CU and d'oh U have good Ds. We actually scored more efficiently against CU and d'oh U than they typically allow power5 competition.

Last bullet will be the one to watch. UT played good D, and so did we. They hit their open 3's. We didn't even hit the rim tooo often.