at 4:30 you had the wrong 2 people we were reading on the option. We weren't reading he ILB. We were reading the DE and the OLB. The DE took the B back and the OLB who was the pitch read slide to far inside so Thomas kept the ball.
Minnesota Vikings, Ancient Roman Nobility and Barney. I'm sure their are many others but that's off the top of my head. As far a prep time I'm sure they spent some time this summer on it and maybe a period or 2 of the first 2 weeks.
Yes he has run it several times with Hawaii and in the 2008 spring game. I have not seen it in an actual game at GT though. As I believe Stylee said its a high cost play for this offense. I think it was discussed on here some time ago. It's with a half roll with the back side a back getting...
A counter we have used on this motion, rip or liz, in the past is g counter option to the b back. The last time I saw it was when Dwyer was here then again we don't use rip or liz that much.
It's because they are 1 and 2 in the counting system. You start counting 4i, inside shoulder of the tackle, and out. 1 and 2 you leave unblocked. One is the dive read and the other is the pitch read. Number 3 is blocked by the A back. That is why CPJ said last that we could not count to 3...
I have to admit I thought he was the defensive coordinator at BC when the last coach left. I just looked it up not only wasn't he but never coached on that side of the ball. Thanks for pointing that out.
Did anyone else see that BC sometimes lined up in a 33 d with the 2 safeties stacked over the nose and Mike. Am I the only one and has anyone else seen that before. It looked like the "front" safeties job was to take the pitch and track down anything outside. I have no idea what his pass...
I think we tried it once last year. The first time I saw it was with navy 3 or 4 years ago. My question is what kind of plays are complementary to it. I would think there would need to be at least one more play off that motion. Maybe a fake toss boot pass? Maybe even a fake toss with the...
I don't think he is saying that CPJ intentionally chose a lessor player to start just because. I think he is arguing that CPJ was emphasizing different things that the poster valued less that caused CPJ to choose a lessor player in the poster eyes because of it. I won't be dragged further into...
Honestly I think that is kind of faulty logic. I think Skov had shoulder injuries which limited his ability to play and be physical but his vison and cutting ability were far from ideal. How much of this is because of lack of reps because of the injuries but he did markedly miss several reads...
He just meant the he expects a wr to emerge into the go to guy. That none of them to this point has done it or shown themselves deserving of it. He's not saying that there are no wrs on the roster the could be go to wrs.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.