Search results

Excellent argument. Let's hire Bohannon asap. Because you are right. A parade of 2 stars or less for Paul's years: Clinton Lynch, Robert Godhigh (unrated), Phil Smith, Tevin Washington, B. J. Bostic (also unrated), Corey Griffin, Ajani Kerr, Jalen Camp, Jahazeil Lee, Sean Tobin, and others...

And that's why I bet he appointed his strategic guy to be interim AD. You can't find out how to fit the athletic program into the rest of the institute until you have someone there who can start to figure out how to do it. I wouldn't be surprised if Neville ends up with the job.

Now this post is just plain flying in the face of facts. No one is suggesting that we "give up on recruiting". What is being suggested is that we are probably already doing the best we can and need to combine that with good coaching. Look at it this way. A font above suggested that we are in a...

My bad. I meant Red Blaik, of course. The names are very similar, but I should have checked the spelling first.

The original post said, and I quote, "… nothing says we can't be pulling in 4 and 5 star recruits by the half dozen each season at the very least." Well, actually, there is. 4 4 star recruits is a lot different from 6 4 and 5 star recruits. Tech can get 4 4stars every now and then, but...

I don't see any problem at all with a coach bringing in assistants he knows how to work with, no matter what the level involved. Paul had great success with a crew made up largely of his former assistants from Georgia Southern. If Chadwell wants to bring in coaches who know what he wants to do...

I hate to rain on anybody's parade and I hope this isn't taken personally, but this is what I mean when I sometimes refer to "visions of sugarplums" when I talk about Tech fans. I agree that Tech can return to football respectability, and occasionally to prominence. But there are real...

1. Yes. If Tech can get him Chadwell would be easily the best hire. He'll cost some money, however. 2. You would think that gaging what we should do about a coaching choice by consulting the Big Donors™ would be completely and comprehensively refuted for the rest of Tech football history by...

You watch. This is a best value for the money game. Moncken would be the best choice, but he won't leave Army. Both of these guys are there for the taking and would do a good job at Tech. We'll burn the phone lines (well … the satellites) up trying to get others then we'll come down to them or...

I'll also reiterate that there are two head coaches with winning records, ability to develop programs, and who will take the job for what Tech is willing to pay. Dan Mullen Brian Bohannon

I don't disagree and I want our first call to be to Winston-Salem. I think we have a chance, albeit no more then a 40-60 shot. The guy will take awhile to be successful if he comes; his teams are all built around 5th year players. And he is a bear on player development. Hartman is a good...

Oh? Why not? Well, maybe the players will give him more effort. We'll. see.

I think this is very encouraging. Like an idiot, I had assumed that something like a outside strategic review was going on as a regular procedure. On reflection, it is obvious that I'm giving the athletic department and the Hill far too much credit. Well, now we'll see. I have no doubt that...

Sounds like it's time for us to use Grigua's Prayer: Oh, Lord, our situation is dire. Please come and help us, but don't send your Son; this is not a time for children.

I agree with those above that Sanders would not be that interested: Tech won't let him do what he wants to do and it won't brush aside academics enough. I'd be happy with Chadwell too, but I don't know if we can interest him. Ok, who has head coaching experience, is a proven winner that Tech...

I've thought about this myself. I think it is because the spread option makes it hard for the announcers to focus on particular players and what they do. In a system O you have to know why things are working or not and that requires a considerable amount of football knowledge. Many of the people...

I'm sorry to hear this; almost as sorry as I was when Coach Fulcher decided to not return to Tech. He was a quality coach and we were unfortunate to lose him.

Ah, Cruyff's Law: Quality without results is pointless. Results without quality are boring.

Not to mention the games themselves. I remember a shot at the press box when we played Fresno State in the Boise Bowl. Paul was up there with a look of disgust on his face at the misuse of the team that I've seldom seen equaled. And, sure enough, he did use that outfit a lot more effectively...

Just the answer I'd like to hear from him.