Search results

December 2018 called. It wants its post back.

Thank-you. Isaiah Crowell was definitely one of the players I had in mind in my foggy memory.

This. Rather than focus on W-L, I agree in expecting high-energy effort for the whole game. My quantitative expectations (you may disagree) are for improved D efficiency. I expect fewer than 1.8 ppd allowed against power 5 competition. I also expect respectable O efficiency, more than 2 ppd...

Am I right in assuming we need Dish to pick it up to get it on sling?

This is why only looking at W-L is a poor way of assessing a HC. OR This is excuse-making and defense of mediocrity. I've always chosen option 1.

On an unrelated Title IX question, when will all the other genders demand an equal number of sports teams? The current assumption only men's and women's sports seems so 20th century in its cis-normativity.

I'd like to see what he can do against ACC level talent ... Eeeeeeeyyyyyyyoooooo!!!!!

How does anyone take a " 'staff' comparison" thread seriously?

I'm not my post was clear. There was a LB or DB wearing the #1, and they wanted him to play some downs at RB. However, they had a WR wearing #1. So, as I remember it they notified the officials and the opposing coaches that he was coming in, and they gave him a different number. Fwiw, this...

I'm pretty sure there was a game where a dwag defender wearing 1 changed jerseys to play a snap on O because there was another guy wearing 1.

Sorry, I was just being stupid.

Or you could kick it back so we get the subscription for $11

My what if for that first game focuses on the D. What if our D holds them in check and our O is given time to get comfortable? Then anything could happen. I think we are more likely to win 14-13 than 35-31 (which is not the same as being more likely to win).

OK, if you want me to put you on ignore this badly.

In post 111 of the "Paul Johnson visiting the Ravens" thread (which is locked so that I can't formally quote it), I said, among other things, the following: Fwiw, I am really enjoying the Collins Culture. I love the tweets with strength and conditioning clips. I love Waffle House Wednesday. I...

This is a great discussion. TaQuon Marshall played well for us. Yet he should not have been our first option. Ratliff, Jordan, Johnson, and yes Campbell were all better quarterback prospects, imo. Outside of the Georgia Tech bubble, fans talk about the QB. With Marshall, we were below the...

This. My take, fwiw, based on the last 7 months, is that CGC is using Dabo's model without Dabo's money nor academic environment but with the 404 and GT degree. I still think time will tell.

It seems there was something lost in translation. Here's my post from the Collins Effect thread: Then a clarification a couple posts later: Then not many posts later you replied to my post which simply said, "We'll know in a year" (click on the little arrow to see the post in context): I...

1) Under Chan (whom I didn't like as our coach) and under CPJ (whom I loved as our coach), I consistently said W-L alone is an immature assessment of the HC. 2) I'm a GT fan. I don't owe anyone proof by joining a hype train for a coach before a single snap -- least of all using a single...

I'm not an expert but is this something that can change normally between offseason and workouts? Does only 7 guys in winter/spring 2019 mean only 7 guys in August 2018? How many guys did 18 or 19 reps initially?