Search results

And Tony Amerson is my new favorite recruit.

Any names we are waiting to announce that we were in on ... Either committed or not? Weren't there a few 'surprise' visitors this past weekend?

I don't care for certain parts of my job. I still do them to the best of my ability.

It's not official he is transferring yet.

I'll entertain you for now. Missing a TE? Mike Leach seems to agree that TEs aren't necessary. Oh that's another 3o team. Wait hang on ... Now I'm confused. Next ... QBs? These guys were all rated 3* or more as dual threat qb or athletes. And we don't need to throw 25+ times to win. Ask...

I'm just sitting here thinking. This guy says he was at Tech 35 years ago. I'm no tech grad or math major, but i'd say that puts him in his 50s. A 50 year old man trolling a sports message board? Embarrassing if you ask me. Stick to letting the 12 year olds do that, bud. To stay on topic ...

I think this thread and the Justin fields talk highlights your point, unfortunately. Gone are the days of research; let's just start rumors and claim to be the first to break it if the 1 in 1000 actually happens. No repercussion if I'm wrong. :confused:

Id much rather have a pure X's and O's OC than a guy that recruits but isn't a great coach. We need balance. I know all of you love the idea of recruiting is everything and *s are all that matters, but that's not true. You need balance, and I hope we get that in an OC. With that said. Give me...

.

You know what .You are right. I'll also ignore being a fundamental reason we have seen increased football resources, more fair drug policy, etc. I'm going to hate his offense so much I'll keep my blinders on

You may look at the pretty paint job and say look what Paul didn't do. But you choose to ignore the frame that Paul began building so you could paint it pretty.

If he doesn't honor the guys already here, I will immediately regret the hire.

I just laugh because everyone seems to think that we will become overnight sensations by ridding ourselves of the 3o. I hope you are all right and my hesitation is unwarrented ... But 100+ years of history says otherwise. Unless the new coach can continue to level the $$ playing field. I am...

Maybe not on the field to some. But from all account I've seen he has made major headway (compared to our starting point) with TS towards fixing the more challenging, off the field hurdles.

And when we go 7-5 every year with better recruits .. :ROFLMAO:

There are a lot of valid arguments for it. With that said ... If they stop with the 3o talk, would you start beating the navy jersey dead horse as that appears to be what we will be wearing in bowl game?

I think it's fair to say I need to see improvement as we adapt to a new system. Even if it's in recruiting, 1 win increase, spending, etc. I'm not going to be ok going 2-10 over the next 4 years and just chalk it up to 'rebuilding.'

1 year. If we to 2-10 next year, so be it. I'm not saying he needs to win 10 in year 2, but I need to see improvement and understand the new coaches direction and vision ... Both on and off the field. If we look just as bad in year 2 then I'm going to start being uneasy about the hire.

Fake news. Just us. Everyone else had an elite defense, but the 3o was holding us back from having the #1 d in the country.

I'd take Malzahn all day. His system required a stud athlete at QB. We have one or two of those. Plus he'd bring all those SEC trade secrets with him.