Search results

A name I had forgotten. He could fly.

a. I don't know he is "bound to fail." I know he did once. I know I question a Notre Dame third stringer knocking us dead at GT and what that says about GT football. b. In setting "effort" as his primary goal Collins joins, well, every football coach in America. c. don't know he has passed on...

So did you just say "effort" is new to Georgia Tech? That would surprise me and astonish others.

That excuse that "the coach doesn't like me" started with Cain and Abel.

Well, I dunno. ND spent an awful lot of time and money recruiting a 4(5?) star that was wrong for them. "Doesn't fit" covers up a lot of deficiencies, but my big concern is whether he will compete or not. And right now he is 0 for 1.

Exactly why the excitement that Tech might get a guy who quit on his previous team because he was 3rd string? And what would it say about competition if he chose GT as his next stop?

Now there is a name I could have gone a lifetime without hearing again. He is the guy, I think I recall correctly, who made the approach to Thomas as a representative of some figure I never quite got, and the result when it all washed out was probation for Tech. There was that and the fact that...

Well, if the season goes like some on the board fear, you do realize this is a form of child abuse, right?

From what everybody is saying, it will be a minor and temporary distraction.

And you think it will make it easier on the O line? Ever watch those guys at work? One might argue cut blocking, but there is running and diving and crawling in any O line just to get at the defense before the defense gets an advantage. Option or zone blocking, those guys get beat up.

you know what drives people nuts about Bradley? The same as what drives people nuts about any columnist. We expect them to have an opinion and to state it forcefully. Just as long as we agree with it. If somebody didn't want him fired he should be fired for not doing his job.

Hard for me to figure out what makes us maddest: he got Johnson right and as per usual in such relationships after the guy left town, or that he may have the new guy right. Maybe both? We always knew Johnson would wear better at a distance. Jones is superfluous, really. At a distance obviously...

I would love to stand up and boldly predict GT would stand its ground and stay in the hunt until the 4th quarter at least. I'd like to. But it appears Venables is being Venables, dammit, and that offense is loaded even as they continue to work on Lawrence's delivery. Maybe the tailgaters outside...

Might we first win just one game?

I don't know about the depth chart, since all those QBs are under-center option guys. But I am hoping he is good enough to step to the front. Lots of freshmen do it, and I would think he is a candidate. (While he has no track record at Tech, neither has he a bad track record.) I don't care as...

Ah, you're right. The guys he is trying to recruit never blocked a lick in their lives. No comparison.

Were I a great RB or potentially so, why would I go to an offense that throws the ball half the time? Now he is a blocker 30-40% of the plays, maybe run an occasional route, and shares the few running plays with other backs. You know, kind of like the A backs of the recent past.

Well, you know Venables. Break out Oliver and Graham.

The whole tweet is put together like two mad scientists in mid-career change. Between the caps and the exclamation all we are missing is the red ink. Wait ... there was that too.