Search results

there is no doubt that we are punching above our weight... we're just in a featherweight class! I suspected UCF was decent, so maybe I went a week too far in qualifying our last "good" opponent, but in any case, only Clemson, Ole Miss, UCF and FSU are in the top 50. We "should" beat Miami, but...

does this indicate a healthy Sims or just that Sims is the top guy if he is ready?:unsure:

The bolded I agree with. I think FSU is the only GOOD team we have seen since Ole Miss. As nasty as our schedule looked to be, its proving full of paper tigers and under achieving teams. UNC is going to be a real interesting test for the entire staff. Their D is bad; we get to see if there...

That'd be "his'n" and "your'n" ;)

On a related note... well, “related” is a stretch maybe, but anyway... Bama’s blocking ain’t great. I thought that even early in the Utah St game. It did not look like a Bama line. We have a guy here who presumably left Bama to rebuild our OL. Both teams now seem to struggle. Our reasons for...

that has been something I have noticed a lot in college football after watching CPJ's offense for so long... many offensive teams run plays that seem very SLOW developing. Defenders can get blocked and recover before the ball is out of the backfield. The offenses are reading so much that it...

Give it up, man. STARS matter. Only STARS. Everything else is an afterthought. If only we had known years ago, we could’ve started bringing in more STARS. Stop worrying about blocking and tackling... everybody does that! Just STARS! Not 2, not 3, not even 4... 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

I don’t know a thing about that but it just “feels” wrong to me. Seems odd that we would make a decision like that before hiring a new AD and before seeing the interim HC play out at all. At any rate, the article points out “conveniences” for both BOB and Key that are hard to deny. We shall see...

Thanks for the insight.... Interesting to say the least! I agree with your parting shot on Long but I am looking forward to UNC. That defense is about as close as we can get to running “dummy offense” so I am anxious to see how his approach is SUPPOSED to work. If it doesn’t work in Chapel...

Wow... this is interesting information. I am a little unclear on the timetable though. Was Goose supposed to be the initial plan instead of Patenaude? Are you saying Key wanted out when Goose fell through at the start (in other words Key almost never came here)? You used the term "resign" so...

With Key, you're probably right. With BOB, that's way off base. BOB's time at GT is about 99% irrelevant as to why he is qualified as a candidate. Basically everything he has done elsewhere is why he is qualified. There is both a GT familiarity and a Batt familiarity, but neither is the...

I thought about this thread when I saw that play! :ROFLMAO: Ugly on a lot of counts. Two guys came unblocked and disrupted the timing. Pyron wanted to shovel it, but there was a defender standing right there. He did well just to get rid of it without a turnover. that extra second or two...

probably not a popular choice, but I went with BOB. I just feel like we need a "can't miss" guy right now. Maybe it's my pessimistic nature, but a lot of these guys feel high risk... Key would be choice 1B, because if he is the guy, it means the next three weeks are going to be a lot of fun...

Yeah.... I can't wait for the day when we can write big checks for the coaches we want, instead of the ones we don't. :confused:

Seems like they haven't played the same QB for four straight quarters, much less, two weeks in a row. They are really struggling with mistakes offensively. I agree (and hope) this is a BIG advantage to us since we have been very opportunistic on D. Hopefully our O looks more like the one that...

Speculation is we don't have that $$$ He may be "available," but to someone with deeper pockets. that said, I hope our revenue position is looking up...

Yep, when I typed "best case" at the end of my comment, that is what I had in mind too... but you would have needed to be there in my head when I typed it, since I wasnt real clear. :) if there was direct head to head impact on that play, both are in concussion protocol, if not injured.

...and we know this well enough to pay lip service to it... or maybe to accept it an excuse. It just doesn't feel like we really practiced what we preached. Hopefully we are truly paying attention and doing what it takes to get the big guys we need up front on both sides. I did see a couple...

In the context of "give me examples" discussion, I threw out Lashlee as a name to watch / consider in the coaching carousel. He's Malzahn of 10-15 years ago... Obviously we want no part of that defense, but offensive production has never been an issue. Neither of those teams concerns...

Maybe you’re trying not to give more info than you should, but this statement isn’t exactly going out on a limb. :)