Search results

We disagree on this point, but like your kangaroo analogy. Unless of course, you are CGC.

Great news. Look forward to to seeing him play and glad to see he will get his masters from the institute.

gtcrew are you CGC trolling this site? lol Seriously, as you stated, the GCG experiment will be interesting to see how it plays out. Although I do not think it is fundamentally different than other college programs. Every program is a "developmental program". Every program has a practice...

What do you think CGC means when he says "developmental program?

I may like Thacker, but the defense ranked next to last in the ACC. http://theacc.com/stats.aspx?path=football&year=2019 Not much better than the offense which ranked last. We may like the coaches, but the stats do not paint a pretty picture. Lots of room for improvement.

That record is more than enough to appease many on this board. And I would assume TStan has a set of expectations and would look at what the program looks like overall. My opinion is that record buys him another season. But my opinion means nothing. TStan is the one making the moves. And...

If CGC is 9-27 after 3 years, even the folks with gold colored glasses will be hard pressed to make a case supporting CGC and the staff. But I hate "what ifs". CGC needs to show the program is improving. If the CGC "process" is not developing players after 3 years, then I agree it would be...

One would hope to see improvement, year over year. Year two offers opportunity against some quality opponents and an opportunity to show improved play. An upset early next season would buy CGC some "leash". I still want CGC to succeed. I have to believe CGC is extremely disappointed with...

I would love to know how this works. Who decides the number of exceptions. I assume it is not the board of regents. It is not the AA. So is it someone on the hill that decides? I really do want to know what the process is to define the number of exceptions. I know it is not the coaching...

This is the strangest thread ever. Does not matter. The dawgs just got spanked. Life is good.

After a couple of brews and an a## kicking of the dawgs. I will say I hope Collins is the man. I love his intensity and his emphasis on recruiting. After recently losing an OL recruit, I hope he can keep this class after a disappointing year. Or improve it with grad transfers and poaching...

I enjoyed the Channel 46 post game. How to spin an a## whipping into a positive.

Now my neighbor can take down the Ggag flag from his mailbox.

I appreciate Ken's articles. I think he tries to spin the positives. Although it is sad to think Tech could have gone 0-12 this year.

I do not recall any classes that graded on a curve. Especially in Aerospace Engineering. Maybe there were, but you either made the grade or did not. To quote Yoda, "Do or do not, there is no try".

Agree with you.

Stech, please rethink this. You grade a first year head coach after his first year not his second. Humor intended...

Perfect!

forensic, appreciate your post. I am mature enough to realize those that are the most opinionated will be the ones with the most posts and get under your skin the most. The posts I enjoy the most are the ones that have stats or data to back up opinions. And there are many on this board that...

Is CGC recruiting a kicker? Forget about resources or any other BS, is he recruiting a kicker?