Search results

I'm not sure if you're messing with me or not, but I'll assume you aren't. He gave the original post about points per drive. He said Ga Southern had very good points per drive against us, compared to the rest of their schedule (indicating that our defense was among the worst they faced). You...

....what?

I may be guilty of this. I only watched the second half and was flicking back and forth with the uva game

I was reading his lips. He was yelling at vic alexander. Its not printable on a family website.

Johnson must prefer a conservative defense, because he has hired DC's over and over and over who do not have attacking, aggressive philosophies.

Seriously, I want Ted heating up the other teams backfield most of the game. The team will give up big plays if he does. Fine. They will also make big plays.

Yes, I was being a little bit over the top when I said every drive :) I understand the strategy, conceptually, i do. I just trust a college quarterback a lot more to make a succession of easy, short throws against soft pressure than I do to make one long throw, under high pressure. I think...

Yes, i get it too, but the point is, they're getting smoked as is. Yes, they might get smoked playing aggressive, but they might make a play too. If you were sacrificing something by playing aggressive, that'd be one thing, but you're not. Pitt scored every possession playing one way, it's not...

The thing is, Roof CLEARLY believes in being sound. Like, there's a reason Rod Rook Chungong plays. There's a reason you hear him game after game after game talk about consistency and execution. That means he doesn't believe in just unleashing the hounds and seeing what happens for better or...

Attack attack attack. 4 quick tds and 2 turnovers are better than 5 slow tds and a punt. Take risks, be hyper aggressive, bending does no good if you eventually break. Attack and force the opponents to make big plays, especially early in games. If you get way up, then you can go more...

Frankly, yes, I think you should expect less. GT is not a football factory, it does not have the same resources, and it has additional burdens. Thus, all things being equal, you are not going to be as good as the football factories. That's not excuse making, that's a basic understanding of...

I wish we'd stolen a coach from the Colorado School of Mines...grumble grumble grumble

Legit lol. Zima was good, dude. I wont pretend otherwise. So were wine coolers.

38-28 Clemson

Phrasing?

Oh, we're talking about it. Believe me, we're talking about it. We're also talking about how you can't just show up at UVa and have an entire religions worth of kids dreaming to play for you. You actually have to go out and convince kids that it's a good fit, and that the other schools that are...

We have Tony Bennett, which makes football season bearable, because we know we're going to get to see a well run program in the winter.

Dude...it's a freaking goat rodeo. There is a MASSIVE debate going on right now on the sabre (Uva's version of gtswarm) about what our actual talent level is. I'm of the opinion that we're PLENTY talented enough to beat UCONN and not get our stool pushed in by Richmond. The loss to Oregon is...

I actually agree with 100% of this. That said, you look like a MINIMUM of bowl eligible this season, with the possibility of something special. That's not a bad place to be, no?

That's a little bit worrisome, honestly.