Search results

He would have to see time on the court....

Agree. Unless Huff discovers a new love of hustle and playing D like a Hoo, I think he'll be a seldom used reserve until he graduates or transfers. He is just brutal defensively right now and that's not going to get you playing time under Bennett

hasn't Outlaw been there 8 or 9 years already?

NCAA version is that he lied to them and then also tampered with witnesses to get them to lie also. If true, he's done. CDL's version is that he lied, recanted later and never told anyone else to lie. If true, he should get a relatively small penalty

Starting with Price & Salley's sophomore year, we've been to the NCAAT 15 times. We've also been to the NIT 7 times. We've missed the postseason entirely 14 times during that stretch. The part that sucks is when you look at a timeline 1984 - 1996 NCAA: 10 NIT: 2 Whiff: 1...

He'll be in Durham four more years. Doubt he stays after that.

UNC would have Brooks and Manley returning up front and adding Bacot. That's a solid front court. Assume they add Cole Anthony to Leaky Black, Seventh Woods and Robinson. Throw Platek in for emergency backup duty. That's not a bad roster. Maybe not Final Four but likely top 3 in ACC...

Not a surprise. Friend of mine is married to a former UNC women's player. To say she dislikes Hatchell intensely would be an understatement

Lots of buzz that Bolden won't be back.

Not sure what that "analysis" is supposed to show. All they did was take the gross number of donors and the number of living alums and say "if every donor is an alum, here's the ratio" To say that is moronic and meaningless would be kind. If someone could show that the actual % of alums...

Maye, Johnson and white shot 14-40 (3-18 from 3). What a wonderful sayonara to those three

Would only be better if you could somehow slide Wade & L$U into the same regional

I'll miss him and think he would've helped the team next year. Best of luck, CGB If Didenko doesn't show up and Shembari leaves too, we have a pretty serious depth issue. 8 scholarship players.

Title IX doesn't say the school has to offer the same sports, however, it would be a very difficult case to argue that women's lax or other non-rev sport is an equivalent opportunity with men's hoops. As a general rule, if you offer a men's revenue sport (except football), you have to also...

Didn't see that one coming. Good hire by Bama

As long as Title IX is on the books, schools have to "provide equitable opportunity" to play for both men & women. Football is exempt. Scholarships: Title IX requires that female and male student-athletes receive athletics scholarship dollars proportional to their participation; and...

It’s called the Situational Ethics Conference for a reason

Ron B seems to think you can.... ;)

I get that. I have teams I can't stand, too. I just don't act like it's a conspiracy. I understand sometimes they have better talent or sheer luck and they win. That concept seems foreign on this board. More puzzling is the persistent narrative that the ACC has some evil conspiracy to...

I've noticed a persistent pattern on this board. Interested if I am the only one... GT wins: We are awesome. refs sucked but didn't cost us the game GT wins: We are mediocre or bad. refs are in a big collusion to screw us and every missed shot was because of a foul. We never foul, or...