Search results

Hmmmm

I haven't been on here to reply but that link should clarify it. Full Mangino is personal humiliation of players on a large scale. One thing I remember from that story is some message board people can't tell the difference between intentional humiliation and being a little mean.

Which brings us full circle to why the phrase "student-athlete" was coined by the NCAA in the first place. They thought the schools would be responsible for workman's comp if deemed to work for the school in any way. Now add in health insurance and you'd have huge sums of money.

To add to the thought:

UNC mailed that first half in. No effort on the boards at all. Auburn is going full Rodman against White, foul non-stop and they won't call it.

Texas Tech is abusing that little Simpson kid on Michigan. Almost all of their points have come against him and he can't function against their defense. Beilein appears ready to die on that hill.

In other words, Full Mangino.

Maybe I am missing something but I can't think of a better reason to fire a coach. If not one player can trust the coach how could anyone in the sport ever succeed? This is what happened with Bill Lewis, by the way.

We will miss his passing and defense. He probably threw the best entry passes on the team.

How so? There seem to be a lot of conclusions being drawn from little information throughout this thread.

Again, not full Mangino

Never go full Mangino

Gee. Ya think? Excerpt: Around the sport, coaches have long joked that Adidas and its infamous “Black Opps” grassroots division wasn’t bidding against itself for star players.