Search results

No we didn't NEED to pass. But we need to develop a passing game. IMO it was an opportunity to develop it.

If we don't have a passing game we wont beat Puke. I thought we should have passed at least 12 to 15 times last night. The bright spot on defense are the turn overs. But 31 points not. Take away the 21 first quarter points the score is 45 to 31. I think we have to score 45 minimum to beat...

Friday nights are for HS football and is where I will be.

Looked to me he missed the hole. cut behind his blocker would have made two yards.

No! Still due to D not getting a stop in the 4th qtr.

We've won uga, VT away. Clemson atmosphere big home advantage there but not Miami. Miami crowd atmosphere doesn't seem to be like uga VT or Clemson.

I am sure they discuss the D plan. Two heads are always better than one and Dabo played under one of the best D coaches in football.

This is why Dabo has become a good coach? or great manager. CPJ did say essentially that he was busy with offense to point of not seeing all that was going on.

51-6 score by PSU is not a good indication of Pitt being that bad. We will have to play better than we did against USF to beat them. They fix their problems and we don't fix ours it could be a loss. Can't let that score put into minds of our guys that it will be a push over. It won't be.

Believe me We gone be alright ++ I believe you!!! Go win the coastal ! Start with Pitt!!

Great post and you should include Rice who is still trying to play Big Boy Football but can't compete.

Good question. both at wrong hole. The line is not showing pass blocks. There should have been a collision at the hole, unless the QB optioned and held on to ball. Why isn't holding called on USF for hugging our #32? Arm on his back and essentially inside both his arms.

Would have helped but not easily and not for sure. Even with the KO TDs It was in the D hands to hold them. Their O out coached our D coach IMHO. I thought the targeting calls were BS but I think most of them are.

The two KO returns may have played a larger role in the loss than just 14 points. Since they ran fewer offensive plays in first half, Woody may have been limited in seeing what their O may bring in second half. This could have limited proper adjustment at the half on how we played the QB runs...

" in the fourth quarter after the Jackets took a 38-28 lead with 14:15 remaining in the game. Over the course of their next two possessions, the Bulls gutted the Jackets by driving 76 and 88 yards for touchdowns to take a 42-38 lead with 5:08 to play in the game. In 18 plays in the two drives...

We better. Right now we are undefeated in ACC play and getting to ACC play off is doable. We moved the ball made a lot O yards. But KO returns for TDs and two 90 yard TD marches in 4th quarter was the real difference.

Would have been important to practice it and plan it if/ when needed.

Thinking Woody would be our savior was based on some wins of A State against top teams. But his Ds gives up points however seem to get turn overs. Which after the first pick didn't happen. ST play lost the game but I wonder what Woody thinks about 700 yards of offense and dominate TOP the D...

I don't understand how we forced Barnett to run but could not adjust his finding wide open areas to gain yards. He beat us with running IMHO not passing. I guess with the threat of passing that left holes for him to run to and through.

over 66