Search results

What?

Or frame Pastner for the murder of Mr. Peanut. I think it is a reasonable expectation for the program if you ignore the previous and current coaching staffs.

We went to 3 out of 5 in Hewitt's first 5 years. We went to 2 out of 6 in the rest of his tenure.

Okogie may have been better than expected under Gregory. Lammers would likely have been just a shot blocker under Gregory. The staff did a good job identifying his talent and putting him in a position to succeed. It took Gregory 3 1/2 years to figure out MGH was better with the ball in his hands.

You left out "when Hardy and LaBarrie were on the bench with him."

That would be tough, with El Chapo and all.

He isn't getting fired for cause. That isn't something that happens except for rare and serious cases. Unless one of the kooks on here kills someone and Pastner gets framed for it, this is not a possibility.

I don't think one person with season tickets this year bought them because of the possibility of going to the NCAAT. We are at the loyal core at this point.

I stated that I believe the contract was set up to give him 5 years. I don't know how else to answer that. One makes their rotations deeper by playing more players. Moore and Price have been playing few minutes. They can play more. Cole should play more. Maybe someone else. At that point you...

I think there is enough talent on this team to make the tournament. I don't think we have a coherent approach on offense and don't play enough guys. Our rotations are also erratic. Pastner's contract is set up to give him 5 years. Given that reality and the fact he did a good job his first year...

This is a silly argument. What matters is that Jose is a legitimate ACC player. We need more of those. Whether they make some arbitrary line in some flawed ranking system is moot. Choosing to recruit and sign Jose is one of the better things Pastner has done.

Both Wes and Durham? :sneaky:

I think we've dug too deep of a hole to climb out but there will be some unusually poor resumes that slip in to the tournament this season the way things are going.

I believe the correct figure for Monday is zero. I've seen a lot of posts flying around that Clemson and LSU get paid extra for winning the semifinal games. They only get expense money for that.

There is only a travel allowance for the final game. There is no extra money for making the final game. From the CFP website: A conference will receive $6 million for each team that is selected for the semifinal games. There will be no additional distribution to conferences whose teams qualify...

I have seen this figure quoted multiple times. Where is this coming from?

Kenpom numbers (national rankings): GT Offensive efficiency: 208 Defensive efficiency: 27 Tempo: 105 (GT was in the 200s the last 2 years) BC Offensive efficiency: 234 Defensive efficiency: 76 Tempo: 97 BC's rebounding percentages are bad, as you surmised, O is 275th, D 277th. Overall...

It.