Search results

90s without question. I LOVED Mike Patrick calling ACC games. Halston Lane against UK? No, UNC. Crap i cant remember. Shaun Fein baseline leaner against UK. Tony MF***inv Akins. The Comeback against Wisconsin.that may have been 2001 actually. Anderson, Marbury, Harpring oh my…

ehhhhhh let me go on a rant about the erosion of college basketball awesomeness….

Vanilla Godzilla Best nickname ever

Make sure to thank Field of ****ity Five. Letters of encouragement can be sent to the gel king, Dob Rauster.

This was also what I heard

Haha. Roster continuity and building a program with basically a feeder program could be the key to success? I’ll take “obvious **** to those that were paying attention 36 months ago while jerkoffs like Jeff Goodman and his like killed CBB while running wild with “free the kids bull****” while...

i think it's hilarious. At one point in January/February UK went 6-6 and people were talking about boosters coming together dump Cal and maybe it was time to move on. They won five in a row to close the season and all that talk disappeared. Then two first round losses in SECT and NCAAT and it...

Goes without saying. My stance on that useless collection has been well documented. They basically conceded NIL as a "here, eat that, leave us alone" (Happy Gilmore) moment. https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/c3459708-ab3e-4628-81eb-f2946feb1b2e#zDkrtxbd.copy However, it took pressure from media and...

I don’t blame the players or nostalgic people. I blame journalists and talking heads that pushed for this for years and treated people that opposed them like ****. Now they are the ones screaming “how do we fix it?! What happened?”

Many are just nostalgic for when college basketball was about school pride, conference pride, continuity, regional rivalries and some other things. This is hot ****ing garbage.

Porter Moser was fired?

Burns is the hero College Basketball needs. Easy to root for

Pitt and Wake?

Their metric. The one I keep saying I don’t like. The argument is y’all want more bids based on historical success because you’re afraid of thinking for yourself and being labeled a “hater” by mass dip****s

Fantastic. Let the top 8 of the ACC in with the AQ's every year due to past successes. Certainly don't evaluate teams for the tournament based on what is done during the actual season in which the tournament is being played. I DGAF. The way the sport runs now I won't be watching in a few years...

They moved in this direction in the first place because people complained about the eye test. Which was likely influenced by the "what we see on the front of the jersey" test. Unless you don't let your emotions get involved and have the ability to remain objective. Foreign territory for some.

Are you ****ing brain damaged? I have said multiple times that I am not a big fan of the NET but it is a nice sorting tool. And no, it isnt. Its propped up by three schools (until recently) and occasionally Florida State or Syracuse making a run in the dance.

NET rankings are also performance driven which I am not sure I agree with. I'm not sure I disagree either. A win is still a win but you're rewarded for point differential as well. Being the 351st ranked team in the nation in tempo means you're likely not blowing many teams out. I don't say that...

UK rcving a #3 was ridiculous.

oooooook?