Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Your Choice for OC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 923924" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>You have to have elite OL play and RBs to win like that. It’s why even places like Alabama and Georgia phased it out in favor more spread friendly, RPO based offenses. Only Michigan really just lines up in traditional pro style and runs it down your throat now, and they have elite OL and RBs. They still got clobbered when they faced UGA last year, only 91 rushing yards at 3.4 YPC.</p><p></p><p>If Saban and Kirby have decided it’s more efficient and more successful to run multiple offensive looks, and it’s worked out for them, why would we try to move the needle backwards? If anything we should try to be more innovative with even more looks and concepts. We basically played 2 different styles of football with 2 different QBs across the last 2 games of the year against UNC and UGA. We gave their defenses multiple looks and multiple different things they needed to focus and key in on. Even though those teams had much better talent than we do we were able to have success moving the ball offensively.</p><p></p><p>Like [USER=2580]@TromboneJacket[/USER] just said, there’s no reason to limit the available tools, especially when we’re going to be playing against more talented teams on paper pretty regularly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 923924, member: 4572"] You have to have elite OL play and RBs to win like that. It’s why even places like Alabama and Georgia phased it out in favor more spread friendly, RPO based offenses. Only Michigan really just lines up in traditional pro style and runs it down your throat now, and they have elite OL and RBs. They still got clobbered when they faced UGA last year, only 91 rushing yards at 3.4 YPC. If Saban and Kirby have decided it’s more efficient and more successful to run multiple offensive looks, and it’s worked out for them, why would we try to move the needle backwards? If anything we should try to be more innovative with even more looks and concepts. We basically played 2 different styles of football with 2 different QBs across the last 2 games of the year against UNC and UGA. We gave their defenses multiple looks and multiple different things they needed to focus and key in on. Even though those teams had much better talent than we do we were able to have success moving the ball offensively. Like [USER=2580]@TromboneJacket[/USER] just said, there’s no reason to limit the available tools, especially when we’re going to be playing against more talented teams on paper pretty regularly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Your Choice for OC
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top