Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Yellow Jackets 2020 Class
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LibertyTurns" data-source="post: 573930" data-attributes="member: 789"><p>Actually I’m a turnaround expert. No gloss, just focus on steady enduring improvements & results. If anyone has read any of my posts on how I think/thought we should turn the program around, you’d know that. CGC has demonstrated aptitude and desire in many of those areas already. It makes me hopeful, the grossly exaggerated hype doesn’t float my boat. Frankly, we typically poke fun of the idiots up the road for their annual unrealistic National Championship hopes and other ridiculous boasts because that’s what they are. What should make us different is developing & implementing beneficial changes in every core program area we can, and yes some element of hype needs to be present but trying to make a bunch of GT people like some other fanbases is going to be quite a hill to climb.</p><p></p><p>[USER=282]@slugboy[/USER] The results thus far, very premature & nothing I’d draw any conclusions from, are extremely mixed. We’re rated highly because we have a higher number of recruits which actually is an awful way of rating teams. I’m not so sure any rater can effectively rate one guy .8388 and another .8422, but I hazard a guess you can tell a 4* from a 3* a bit more effectively. A team that has six 4* and six 3* should be rated higher than a team that has one 4* and fourteen 3* for example. It really is kind of silly to think otherwise because it’s just illogical. You can hype it all you want, we are not getting commits from highly rated recruits & until we do we will not have Top 25 recruiting classes. CGC’s approach may pay off- it is not yet. Time will tell. What other option do we have but to trust his way will work out? I’m not joining the ranks of those rooting against GT so I can be right because that’s not who I am. It must have sucked the last 10 years for some. I really don’t know how they rationalized their support or lack thereof.</p><p></p><p>This is likely my last post of this sort because I’m not going to get anyone’s panties in a wad arguing over semantics. I’m not picking a side between the last coaching staff & this one. They’re both GT football teams, just different years. People have their opinion and I have mine. Sorry if you don’t like a less hypey approach.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LibertyTurns, post: 573930, member: 789"] Actually I’m a turnaround expert. No gloss, just focus on steady enduring improvements & results. If anyone has read any of my posts on how I think/thought we should turn the program around, you’d know that. CGC has demonstrated aptitude and desire in many of those areas already. It makes me hopeful, the grossly exaggerated hype doesn’t float my boat. Frankly, we typically poke fun of the idiots up the road for their annual unrealistic National Championship hopes and other ridiculous boasts because that’s what they are. What should make us different is developing & implementing beneficial changes in every core program area we can, and yes some element of hype needs to be present but trying to make a bunch of GT people like some other fanbases is going to be quite a hill to climb. [USER=282]@slugboy[/USER] The results thus far, very premature & nothing I’d draw any conclusions from, are extremely mixed. We’re rated highly because we have a higher number of recruits which actually is an awful way of rating teams. I’m not so sure any rater can effectively rate one guy .8388 and another .8422, but I hazard a guess you can tell a 4* from a 3* a bit more effectively. A team that has six 4* and six 3* should be rated higher than a team that has one 4* and fourteen 3* for example. It really is kind of silly to think otherwise because it’s just illogical. You can hype it all you want, we are not getting commits from highly rated recruits & until we do we will not have Top 25 recruiting classes. CGC’s approach may pay off- it is not yet. Time will tell. What other option do we have but to trust his way will work out? I’m not joining the ranks of those rooting against GT so I can be right because that’s not who I am. It must have sucked the last 10 years for some. I really don’t know how they rationalized their support or lack thereof. This is likely my last post of this sort because I’m not going to get anyone’s panties in a wad arguing over semantics. I’m not picking a side between the last coaching staff & this one. They’re both GT football teams, just different years. People have their opinion and I have mine. Sorry if you don’t like a less hypey approach. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Yellow Jackets 2020 Class
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top