Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
X Penn State President, VP and AD get jail time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vespid" data-source="post: 315808" data-attributes="member: 1436"><p>Well, the NCAA disagrees with your interpretation. Count 1 in the findings and conclusions of the NCAA criminal jury in regards to the case stated that not only was there inadequate controls, in some instances they were non-existent. The following is verbatim from the Binding Consent Decree Imposed by the NCAA, which was accepted and signed by Penn State.</p><p></p><p>" 1. A failure to value and uphold institutional integrity demonstrated by inadequate, and in some cases non-existent, controls and oversight surrounding the athletics program of the University, <strong>such as </strong>those controls prescribed by Articles 2.1 (<em>The Principle of Institutional Control</em>), 6.01.1 (<em>Institutional Control</em>) and 6.4 (<em>Responsibility for Actions of Outside Entities</em>) of the NCAA Constitution. "</p><p></p><p>The FREEH report, a mere 267 pages and the BINDING CONSENT DECREE are readily available on the net. If you look at the major key findings and the time line of key supporting facts in the report, which is only a few pages for each, and compare those with the responsibilities spelled out in the NCAA's Constitution and Bylaws Articles as referenced in Count 1, it's pretty clear, at least to me, NCAA rules were not only broken but ignored by the school. And I agree with you, three months in Jail is a little short for Spanier, Shultz and Curley.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vespid, post: 315808, member: 1436"] Well, the NCAA disagrees with your interpretation. Count 1 in the findings and conclusions of the NCAA criminal jury in regards to the case stated that not only was there inadequate controls, in some instances they were non-existent. The following is verbatim from the Binding Consent Decree Imposed by the NCAA, which was accepted and signed by Penn State. " 1. A failure to value and uphold institutional integrity demonstrated by inadequate, and in some cases non-existent, controls and oversight surrounding the athletics program of the University, [B]such as [/B]those controls prescribed by Articles 2.1 ([I]The Principle of Institutional Control[/I]), 6.01.1 ([I]Institutional Control[/I]) and 6.4 ([I]Responsibility for Actions of Outside Entities[/I]) of the NCAA Constitution. " The FREEH report, a mere 267 pages and the BINDING CONSENT DECREE are readily available on the net. If you look at the major key findings and the time line of key supporting facts in the report, which is only a few pages for each, and compare those with the responsibilities spelled out in the NCAA's Constitution and Bylaws Articles as referenced in Count 1, it's pretty clear, at least to me, NCAA rules were not only broken but ignored by the school. And I agree with you, three months in Jail is a little short for Spanier, Shultz and Curley. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
X Penn State President, VP and AD get jail time
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top