Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
WR U
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Josh H" data-source="post: 307518" data-attributes="member: 1317"><p>Kind of interesting as you also note two of the concerns with each offense. With Tech's, since the running game replaces the short passing game, we don't have a short passing game (slant/flats, screen game, etc) to keep the defense from blitzing. Our offense *expects* to be able to run the ball against the blitz. Likewise, Clemson is built to get the ball out fast hoping to catch the defense out of position or just tired. Break a tackle and its off to the races. But they aren't built to line up and run the ball, they will get their rushing yards, but not the same way that we get ours. (There's also as many complaints about "pick" plays in that offense as there are chop-blocking in ours).</p><p></p><p>Just goes to show that for as much theory as there is about "hitting a defense where they ain't", there's just as much theory for having an identity and imposing your will.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I definitely thought we would at B-back. Who wouldn't want to be the featured back and get 20-25 touches a game. Oddly enough that's the position that has issues translating to the NFL.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Josh H, post: 307518, member: 1317"] Kind of interesting as you also note two of the concerns with each offense. With Tech's, since the running game replaces the short passing game, we don't have a short passing game (slant/flats, screen game, etc) to keep the defense from blitzing. Our offense *expects* to be able to run the ball against the blitz. Likewise, Clemson is built to get the ball out fast hoping to catch the defense out of position or just tired. Break a tackle and its off to the races. But they aren't built to line up and run the ball, they will get their rushing yards, but not the same way that we get ours. (There's also as many complaints about "pick" plays in that offense as there are chop-blocking in ours). Just goes to show that for as much theory as there is about "hitting a defense where they ain't", there's just as much theory for having an identity and imposing your will. I definitely thought we would at B-back. Who wouldn't want to be the featured back and get 20-25 touches a game. Oddly enough that's the position that has issues translating to the NFL. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
WR U
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top