Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tommy_Taylor_1972" data-source="post: 1074115" data-attributes="member: 6776">I was back there with you.&nbsp; The front row guy only described the mens team of 106 years.&nbsp; The womennns team, now in the 44th season since joining the NCAA D1 in 1982with a total of 379 teams.47th in Strength of Schedule ( top 11th percent)43rd in SRS (Simple rating system) (top 17th percent)80th in NCAA tournament appearances with 12 (top 21st percent)121st in win-loss record at 54.3% (top 31st percent)Based on the site <a href="https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/" target="_blank">https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/</a>, the front row guy would say that the Georgia Tech women have done pretty good as well, playing a tough schedule, winning more than losing, and being in the top 20 percent of schools in NCAA appearances.&nbsp; As with the men with winning programs, a respectable legacy that can be built upon quickly.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tommy_Taylor_1972, post: 1074115, member: 6776"] I was back there with you. The front row guy only described the mens team of 106 years. The womennns team, now in the 44th season since joining the NCAA D1 in 1982with a total of 379 teams. 47th in Strength of Schedule ( top 11th percent) 43rd in SRS (Simple rating system) (top 17th percent) 80th in NCAA tournament appearances with 12 (top 21st percent) 121st in win-loss record at 54.3% (top 31st percent) Based on the site [URL]https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/[/URL], the front row guy would say that the Georgia Tech women have done pretty good as well, playing a tough schedule, winning more than losing, and being in the top 20 percent of schools in NCAA appearances. As with the men with winning programs, a respectable legacy that can be built upon quickly. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Who was the starting QB of the 2024 season?