Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Why Dodd why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Skeptic" data-source="post: 429841" data-attributes="member: 2175"><p>I wouldn't argue with the degree brand, and whether Tech can recruit in the suburbs is out of my pay grade. I have no clue. And no, and though I think Tech could do better recruiting -- a notion I quickly admit I can't defend, just a belief -- it won't be a factory, even a good factory. I do like the defining "talent increase" which is an achievable goal. I have peeked in at Clemson often enough over the years to note recruits seem to be universal, kind of machine stamped, to talk about education, no matter where the school, and atmosphere, and coaches, etc. But what really lights them up at Clemson, again and again, are the facilities. Personally I think a football-dedicated building with chefs and dieticians and whatnot is over the top. But it sells. I have some doubts that the "national degree brand" would translate going forward into football recruits. I have been wrong before, and in this case, hope I am again. In the mean time, I want us to compete every Saturday, play exciting football, run a clean program, graduate the players, and if the tradeoff then is to be 8-win seasons, then as a non-Tech grad, I'll take it. But the decision of course is left to those who got out, so to speak.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Skeptic, post: 429841, member: 2175"] I wouldn't argue with the degree brand, and whether Tech can recruit in the suburbs is out of my pay grade. I have no clue. And no, and though I think Tech could do better recruiting -- a notion I quickly admit I can't defend, just a belief -- it won't be a factory, even a good factory. I do like the defining "talent increase" which is an achievable goal. I have peeked in at Clemson often enough over the years to note recruits seem to be universal, kind of machine stamped, to talk about education, no matter where the school, and atmosphere, and coaches, etc. But what really lights them up at Clemson, again and again, are the facilities. Personally I think a football-dedicated building with chefs and dieticians and whatnot is over the top. But it sells. I have some doubts that the "national degree brand" would translate going forward into football recruits. I have been wrong before, and in this case, hope I am again. In the mean time, I want us to compete every Saturday, play exciting football, run a clean program, graduate the players, and if the tradeoff then is to be 8-win seasons, then as a non-Tech grad, I'll take it. But the decision of course is left to those who got out, so to speak. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Why Dodd why?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top