Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Where the Program stands
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SOWEGA Jacket" data-source="post: 877045" data-attributes="member: 4334"><p>You misunderstood my words. It WAS a rebuild. And all of us agreed on that. And we were all willing to give Collins the time to execute his plan. We sat quietly during year 1 while we won 3. Then Collins got us Sims and Gibbs and we all stayed quiet during year 2 while we won 3 games. Then the Head Coach said with his own mouth that year 3 was the marker. And we lost to NIU on opening day and it went downhill from there. It was a rebuild but now it’s a dumpster fire. Whatever rebuild plan Collins had in his head ended with Gibbs and others walking out the door and everyone knowing that he either wins 5-6 games or he’s fired. </p><p></p><p>What I’d like to know when I read Collins book in 10 years is what was his rebuild plan? Most rebuilds focus on bringing in young guys and getting them early experience so by year 3,4, and 5 he has known players with experience to begin turning the program around. Entering year 4 we are going into the season with little experience on the OLine and a completely new secondary. What kind of plan was that? We should have starters with 20 plus games of experience entering their senior or junior seasons. Instead he let incumbent starters with zero college success remain in place while we continued to lose. What did we gain in 3 years of this rebuild? We are worse than the mediocre Johnson end of career years.</p><p></p><p>As to your disagreement with my QB statement, we just disagree. With Taquon we knew exactly what we had at QB.</p><p>And that’s what he gave us - he could run but he couldn’t pass and we were mediocre. We all knew that and Johnson never said Taquon was gonna be Tom Brady. Johnson’s issue was not having a real replacement for Thomas. But we knew exactly what Taquon was as a converted ABack. With Sims we have no clue what we will get after 2 years. Will we get the dual threat stud or will we see passes thrown at the feet of RB’s or will he even see the field after a few hits? What kind of rebuild puts a program in worse shape than what they were rebuilding from? Collins is in survival mode. He’ll fail and in a year from now he’ll be a position coach at a mid level SEC team and we’ll be left with a roster of portal mercenaries and will have made no progress from the day Johnson retired.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SOWEGA Jacket, post: 877045, member: 4334"] You misunderstood my words. It WAS a rebuild. And all of us agreed on that. And we were all willing to give Collins the time to execute his plan. We sat quietly during year 1 while we won 3. Then Collins got us Sims and Gibbs and we all stayed quiet during year 2 while we won 3 games. Then the Head Coach said with his own mouth that year 3 was the marker. And we lost to NIU on opening day and it went downhill from there. It was a rebuild but now it’s a dumpster fire. Whatever rebuild plan Collins had in his head ended with Gibbs and others walking out the door and everyone knowing that he either wins 5-6 games or he’s fired. What I’d like to know when I read Collins book in 10 years is what was his rebuild plan? Most rebuilds focus on bringing in young guys and getting them early experience so by year 3,4, and 5 he has known players with experience to begin turning the program around. Entering year 4 we are going into the season with little experience on the OLine and a completely new secondary. What kind of plan was that? We should have starters with 20 plus games of experience entering their senior or junior seasons. Instead he let incumbent starters with zero college success remain in place while we continued to lose. What did we gain in 3 years of this rebuild? We are worse than the mediocre Johnson end of career years. As to your disagreement with my QB statement, we just disagree. With Taquon we knew exactly what we had at QB. And that’s what he gave us - he could run but he couldn’t pass and we were mediocre. We all knew that and Johnson never said Taquon was gonna be Tom Brady. Johnson’s issue was not having a real replacement for Thomas. But we knew exactly what Taquon was as a converted ABack. With Sims we have no clue what we will get after 2 years. Will we get the dual threat stud or will we see passes thrown at the feet of RB’s or will he even see the field after a few hits? What kind of rebuild puts a program in worse shape than what they were rebuilding from? Collins is in survival mode. He’ll fail and in a year from now he’ll be a position coach at a mid level SEC team and we’ll be left with a roster of portal mercenaries and will have made no progress from the day Johnson retired. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Where the Program stands
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top