Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
What"s this? Vad Lee was a dual threat QB all along ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgtengineer" data-source="post: 876507" data-attributes="member: 3094"><p>Paul tried he installed a good number of these things but communication became difficult and we became predictable. If Vad had ran the flex as well we'd have probably kept evolving it. </p><p></p><p>Johnson did tweek his offense for each QB. He simplified reads for Nesbitt often running a lot more double option off a triple look rather than true triple, and most of the passing was "read primary if not there take off". With Tevin the read tree was extremely complex, we often even changed the counting on the fly it would seem, tevin also had a longer progression in the pass tree. And if you remember tevin was actually rather good at throwing from a pistol with regards to finding the right receiver. When he called for Shaw those few times shaw had to start shaw had the same kind of approach. Vad was the furthest he got from our base offense but that was because vad even had an issue with reading midline at the line of scrimmage. JT was so damn fast but had about the same level of complexity of calls tevin did. Marshall was back to a one read and go, where often i feel the first read for him on any play action was "check the lane, then check the throw unless i tell you otherwise". Byerly was probably our best pure passer, and honestly if JT wasn't JT i still wonder what we would have done with him. Since he was more of a Tim Tebow type bruising runner.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgtengineer, post: 876507, member: 3094"] Paul tried he installed a good number of these things but communication became difficult and we became predictable. If Vad had ran the flex as well we'd have probably kept evolving it. Johnson did tweek his offense for each QB. He simplified reads for Nesbitt often running a lot more double option off a triple look rather than true triple, and most of the passing was "read primary if not there take off". With Tevin the read tree was extremely complex, we often even changed the counting on the fly it would seem, tevin also had a longer progression in the pass tree. And if you remember tevin was actually rather good at throwing from a pistol with regards to finding the right receiver. When he called for Shaw those few times shaw had to start shaw had the same kind of approach. Vad was the furthest he got from our base offense but that was because vad even had an issue with reading midline at the line of scrimmage. JT was so damn fast but had about the same level of complexity of calls tevin did. Marshall was back to a one read and go, where often i feel the first read for him on any play action was "check the lane, then check the throw unless i tell you otherwise". Byerly was probably our best pure passer, and honestly if JT wasn't JT i still wonder what we would have done with him. Since he was more of a Tim Tebow type bruising runner. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
What"s this? Vad Lee was a dual threat QB all along ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top