Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
What can our secondary do to improve?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iceeater1969" data-source="post: 831680" data-attributes="member: 1237"><p>Thanks for the bump.</p><p>Imo, the coverall concept is poorly planned. </p><p>Cgc and thacker are buzz word (effort, relebtless, etc ) about indviduals. While this is important and if scheme worjs is great for recruiting. After Pitt thacker said way less effort than in unc. </p><p></p><p>Agree w your point of better blitzing needed.</p><p>The old staff and now this staff insist that the 3 dl charge into center of the ol guy in front and then bull rush while maintaining lane discipline. With 3 rush and 5 ol we get little progress and they have extra 2 to come off and pick up delayed blitz . Imo, we need to take some risk by dl slant rush angle to make room for blitzer ( the double team ol guy has to come off the dl guy sooner). Without space when we blitz we get the old David Curry fly on wall paper glued to the ol guy. Holding is legal in the pile and we have to frequently schemed ourselves into this dead end.</p><p>If cgc is not goung to have an attacking scheming dc, we have zero chance of being relevant against good teams since they always have good qb. While we can beat a duke w passive plain d, we need to run the aggressive d so we get better and better at it.</p><p></p><p>3 guys being double teamed with narrow rush lanes is stupid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iceeater1969, post: 831680, member: 1237"] Thanks for the bump. Imo, the coverall concept is poorly planned. Cgc and thacker are buzz word (effort, relebtless, etc ) about indviduals. While this is important and if scheme worjs is great for recruiting. After Pitt thacker said way less effort than in unc. Agree w your point of better blitzing needed. The old staff and now this staff insist that the 3 dl charge into center of the ol guy in front and then bull rush while maintaining lane discipline. With 3 rush and 5 ol we get little progress and they have extra 2 to come off and pick up delayed blitz . Imo, we need to take some risk by dl slant rush angle to make room for blitzer ( the double team ol guy has to come off the dl guy sooner). Without space when we blitz we get the old David Curry fly on wall paper glued to the ol guy. Holding is legal in the pile and we have to frequently schemed ourselves into this dead end. If cgc is not goung to have an attacking scheming dc, we have zero chance of being relevant against good teams since they always have good qb. While we can beat a duke w passive plain d, we need to run the aggressive d so we get better and better at it. 3 guys being double teamed with narrow rush lanes is stupid. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
What can our secondary do to improve?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top