We got an "F"?

southernhive

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
500
3 wins and 9 losses? Even UGA grads can calculate that as an F. It was a very disappointing year and I think SA's, Coaches and Fans would all agree. I am still proud of the effort our SA's continued to give down to the last second of the last game.
 
kg01

kg01

Get-Bak! Coach
Featured Member
Messages
15,170
Location
Atlanta
southernhive said:
3 wins and 9 losses? Even UGA grads can calculate that as an F. It was a very disappointing year and I think SA's, Coaches and Fans would all agree. I am still proud of the effort our SA's continued to give down to the last second of the last game.
Click to expand...

Yeah it was an F season basically, but I think the OP is probably more indignant at the lack of any real analysis. Writer basically checked preseason ranking, checked season record and awarded an F.

I was kinda like that in school. I didn't like when teachers just rubber-stamped my grade. I wanted them to do some work too.
 
katlong

katlong

Jolly Good Fellow
Messages
467
Location
Kennesaw, GA
southernhive said:
3 wins and 9 losses? Even UGA grads can calculate that as an F. It was a very disappointing year and I think SA's, Coaches and Fans would all agree. I am still proud of the effort our SA's continued to give down to the last second of the last game.
Click to expand...

Good one about calculations - that's pretty funny. I just found it interesting that other teams (i.e. South Carolina, Maryland, Tulane who were also 3-9) got a better grade than us, especially considering our almost wins and our schedule.

Final rankings show us at 88! So are teams 89-125 F minus?
 
katlong

katlong

Jolly Good Fellow
Messages
467
Location
Kennesaw, GA
kg01 said:
Yeah it was an F season basically, but I think the OP is probably more indignant at the lack of any real analysis. Writer basically checked preseason ranking, checked season record and awarded an F.

I was kinda like that in school. I didn't like when teachers just rubber-stamped my grade. I wanted them to do some work too.
Click to expand...

Thanks. You nailed it!!!! That's exactly my thought!
 

southernhive

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
500
katlong said:
Good one about calculations - that's pretty funny. I just found it interesting that other teams (i.e. South Carolina, Maryland, Tulane who were also 3-9) got a better grade than us, especially considering our almost wins and our schedule.

Final rankings show us at 88! So are teams 89-125 F minus?
Click to expand...

I live in South Georgia, I take digs at uga at every opportunity. :D
 
AlabamaBuzz

AlabamaBuzz

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,020
Location
Hartselle, AL (originally Rome, GA)
F- in my opinion. One win over a P5 team is a really sad. Our talent base and depth must improve. I don't think we can "hope for" a great season every 3-4 years, but have to accept 6-6 or worse the rest of the time. I know that is not where we are at right now, but if we get #50-#80 recruiting classes stacked on top of each other, this could get much worse. No grade worse than F though.
 
GT_B

GT_B

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
665
I agree with the F grade. I understand the lack of analysis, but its an appropriate grade because most people outside of our fan base expected us to have a good season because of last year. I would think most media/writers and regular college football fans would have thought 10-2/9-3 for us this year would be expected and 3-9 is definitely not that. Injuries and the schedule obviously made things a little more difficult, but it doesn't matter, we still had a bad season and did not perform well when we needed to.

You could argue a D could be the right grade, seeing that we were competitive or close in almost every game, but didn't finish. But a D is technically passing in the grading scale now days, and we definitely did not have a passing grade at 3-9.
 
Supersizethatorder-mutt

Supersizethatorder-mutt

Banned
Messages
13,443
Location
Augusta, GA
What's even worse in my book is that BR listed the top 250 college football players, and not a single Tech player was listed. I'm sorry, but regardless of the results of this past season, we SHOULD have at least a couple of players in the top 250. After the Orange Bowl win, Justin was considered one of the top QB's in the country, and even he doesn't make the top 250 now. Just because he was unable to reproduce the results of 2014 doesn't mean he is suddenly no good. It's pure BS in my book.
 
Last edited:

lv20gt

Helluva Engineer
Messages
5,580
kg01 said:
Yeah it was an F season basically, but I think the OP is probably more indignant at the lack of any real analysis. Writer basically checked preseason ranking, checked season record and awarded an F.

I was kinda like that in school. I didn't like when teachers just rubber-stamped my grade. I wanted them to do some work too.
Click to expand...

And if you turned in a half page paper with drool covering it when you were expected to produces a 10 page well though out paper then you shouldn't expect more than a rubber stamp grade. The grade was a forgone conclusion based on what was turned in.
 
JacketFromUGA

JacketFromUGA

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,897
I mean it was an F. But like a 50% not like a 20%

Trust me that's a big difference between kids in my class. The 50% actually has a shot at passing after another try. The 20% kid? We'll call them Kansas.
 
kg01

kg01

Get-Bak! Coach
Featured Member
Messages
15,170
Location
Atlanta
lv20gt said:
And if you turned in a half page paper with drool covering it when you were expected to produces a 10 page well though out paper then you shouldn't expect more than a rubber stamp grade. The grade was a forgone conclusion based on what was turned in.
Click to expand...

Well, @JacketFromUGA explained it well. We got an F but it wasn't like a 20. More like a 68 (69 was F back in my day). The team that got the 20 flat out didn't try. We tried but stuff (injuries, etc.) got in the way, thus we failed with honor?
 
Top