Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Vote: Should Georgia Tech Continue the "Option"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iceeater1969" data-source="post: 498269" data-attributes="member: 1237"><p>U all know I like the ol and the option.</p><p></p><p>Coach is the best at this offense.</p><p>He often said " it is what it is"</p><p></p><p>Without him and our current talent it wont be near the same. They broke the mold when they made Coach.</p><p></p><p>I wish we could continue the current system with more depth and better athletes. Wishing is not a plan.</p><p></p><p>While we can't suddenly get fast on offense, we can get back to regular size ol in the offseason. This is Will Bryan after 16 just before sewak gad him loose 25 lbs. He was ready to play rg w shamire, but we needed him to play multiple positions. [ATTACH=full]4595[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Imo, we let Will (who is getting his strength and conditioning certs ) and Sisk loose on the ol during the off season and we can be ok in year 1.</p><p></p><p>I would like to transition to more of a Stanford or NW offense. Lots of big linemen (both sides) and a good qb and rb. Imo - the morgans could play a role here. Some of the true freshmen could help as TE</p><p>Biggest missing piece is the TE</p><p></p><p>The most important hire is a very very good ol coach. Spend the $$ and the ol coach will ATTRACT and develope the talent . In general ol guys tend to be more suitable to our academics . Gt should aim to be come ol U. </p><p> </p><p></p><p>During the transition we will be heavy option, but ultimately we will be smash mouth with a young hot shot qb.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iceeater1969, post: 498269, member: 1237"] U all know I like the ol and the option. Coach is the best at this offense. He often said " it is what it is" Without him and our current talent it wont be near the same. They broke the mold when they made Coach. I wish we could continue the current system with more depth and better athletes. Wishing is not a plan. While we can't suddenly get fast on offense, we can get back to regular size ol in the offseason. This is Will Bryan after 16 just before sewak gad him loose 25 lbs. He was ready to play rg w shamire, but we needed him to play multiple positions. [ATTACH=full]4595[/ATTACH] Imo, we let Will (who is getting his strength and conditioning certs ) and Sisk loose on the ol during the off season and we can be ok in year 1. I would like to transition to more of a Stanford or NW offense. Lots of big linemen (both sides) and a good qb and rb. Imo - the morgans could play a role here. Some of the true freshmen could help as TE Biggest missing piece is the TE The most important hire is a very very good ol coach. Spend the $$ and the ol coach will ATTRACT and develope the talent . In general ol guys tend to be more suitable to our academics . Gt should aim to be come ol U. During the transition we will be heavy option, but ultimately we will be smash mouth with a young hot shot qb. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Vote: Should Georgia Tech Continue the "Option"?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top