Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
UVA Game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OG-T" data-source="post: 393669" data-attributes="member: 1741"><p>UVA GAME <strong>REPORT CARD</strong>:</p><p>Coaching — "C". With the 4 days (and two practices on Monday) since Pittsburgh game, I would have thought CJP would have put in some special plays/movement that VA had not seen. Also, I was waiting for full-court or 3/4 court press to disrupt the negative flow of game — maybe it works against us, but we needed something instead of watching a slow death going from 8 points to 18 point deficit.</p><p>Lammers — "D". Maybe for Defense, but actually for disappointing. Started with strong block party, but overall, he played like a shy freshman. Concerned his funk is going to continue. He lacks any aggressiveness on offense, or any leadership role. He's not a natural leader; he has quiet leadership with his performance, but his funk is not leading the way. More TOs than points. Missed FTs. UGHly.</p><p>Gueye — "B". He just didn't get the opportunity. I liked his aggressiveness toward the end. He should have been given more opportunity to bring activity to the paint for possible offensive rebounds — a potential weakness of VA defense. </p><p>Okogie — "D". I think he's the most talented, game-changing player on the floor for a majority of games. But he disappears. It's perplexing. He has the ability to slash and slice when he can't rise over a defender, and seems to be TOO passive. Last night was another example of his "Ghostkogie" — just disappearing.</p><p>Jackson — "B". He had his way on many drives. Had some frustrating turnovers, and missed his two 3s. If he had other reliable threats on the floor, his grade would have improved.</p><p>Alvarado — "C". LOVE his toughness and willingness to take it to anyone (sure it gets blocked some time, but he puts pressure on a defense) — I wish Lammers had some of his attitude. 1-7 shooting and 5 TOs, but he shouldn't have the leadership burden as a FR in this game — it's on Lammers and Okogie.</p><p>Alston — "C-". Not much playing time, and mostly ineffective.</p><p>Haywood — "B+". Encouraging shooting touch, and active defense. My knee-jerk complaint is his movement without the ball to try and get himself open for more shots; might be product of system. One addt'l observation is he still seems hampered by the shin injury; there is a strange hobble to his stride.</p><p></p><p>We'll see what UNC brings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OG-T, post: 393669, member: 1741"] UVA GAME [B]REPORT CARD[/B]: Coaching — "C". With the 4 days (and two practices on Monday) since Pittsburgh game, I would have thought CJP would have put in some special plays/movement that VA had not seen. Also, I was waiting for full-court or 3/4 court press to disrupt the negative flow of game — maybe it works against us, but we needed something instead of watching a slow death going from 8 points to 18 point deficit. Lammers — "D". Maybe for Defense, but actually for disappointing. Started with strong block party, but overall, he played like a shy freshman. Concerned his funk is going to continue. He lacks any aggressiveness on offense, or any leadership role. He's not a natural leader; he has quiet leadership with his performance, but his funk is not leading the way. More TOs than points. Missed FTs. UGHly. Gueye — "B". He just didn't get the opportunity. I liked his aggressiveness toward the end. He should have been given more opportunity to bring activity to the paint for possible offensive rebounds — a potential weakness of VA defense. Okogie — "D". I think he's the most talented, game-changing player on the floor for a majority of games. But he disappears. It's perplexing. He has the ability to slash and slice when he can't rise over a defender, and seems to be TOO passive. Last night was another example of his "Ghostkogie" — just disappearing. Jackson — "B". He had his way on many drives. Had some frustrating turnovers, and missed his two 3s. If he had other reliable threats on the floor, his grade would have improved. Alvarado — "C". LOVE his toughness and willingness to take it to anyone (sure it gets blocked some time, but he puts pressure on a defense) — I wish Lammers had some of his attitude. 1-7 shooting and 5 TOs, but he shouldn't have the leadership burden as a FR in this game — it's on Lammers and Okogie. Alston — "C-". Not much playing time, and mostly ineffective. Haywood — "B+". Encouraging shooting touch, and active defense. My knee-jerk complaint is his movement without the ball to try and get himself open for more shots; might be product of system. One addt'l observation is he still seems hampered by the shin injury; there is a strange hobble to his stride. We'll see what UNC brings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
UVA Game
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top