Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Triple Option
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketintheNati" data-source="post: 829519" data-attributes="member: 2810"><p>We keep speaking of talent a PJ players versus CGC players. Against UNC 3 offensive starters were PJ recruits (excluded Yates and noted Sims since he was majority) and defense starters 7 PJ players including a player who earned a scholarship from CGC and was a walk-on. There is heavier rotation on defense, and many are CGC recruits. Bottom line, the offense has been transitioned and the defense has more rotation so a quick review of participation reports indicate about 25-33 % of contributing players remain PJ era. </p><p></p><p>Those numbers make it hard to argue or justify loses to NIU or even Pitt. Responsibility is a funny thing if you loved PJ it is CGC coaching, if you love CGC it is PJ leaving a 5 year transition. </p><p></p><p>You have a divided fan base and the money seems to be with CGC. Therefore, we must remember he who has the gold makes the rules. I don’t necessarily agree but I am a fan of GT not a scheme or a specific style - I just want to win in a fair and respectable manner of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketintheNati, post: 829519, member: 2810"] We keep speaking of talent a PJ players versus CGC players. Against UNC 3 offensive starters were PJ recruits (excluded Yates and noted Sims since he was majority) and defense starters 7 PJ players including a player who earned a scholarship from CGC and was a walk-on. There is heavier rotation on defense, and many are CGC recruits. Bottom line, the offense has been transitioned and the defense has more rotation so a quick review of participation reports indicate about 25-33 % of contributing players remain PJ era. Those numbers make it hard to argue or justify loses to NIU or even Pitt. Responsibility is a funny thing if you loved PJ it is CGC coaching, if you love CGC it is PJ leaving a 5 year transition. You have a divided fan base and the money seems to be with CGC. Therefore, we must remember he who has the gold makes the rules. I don’t necessarily agree but I am a fan of GT not a scheme or a specific style - I just want to win in a fair and respectable manner of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Triple Option
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top