Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
The reports of the TO's death have been grossly exaggerated
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 896433" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>I have no problem saying that Johnson was ultimately responsible for the defensive performance. I have no problem saying that Johnson was ultimately responsible for recruiting. But are you willing to admit that GT wouldn't pay for the DCs that Johnson wanted? Are you willing to admit that Duke had double the recruiting support staff that GT had? Are you willing to admit that the TRAVEL staff for Clemson was as large as the ENTIRE football staff for GT back then?</p><p></p><p>The flexbone was extremely successful as an offense. Most years GT ran the flexbone the offense was in the top 25 offensive FEI. I see the majority of the issues with recruiting and defense as being related to GT getting so far behind the rest of P5 in funding. The HC is ultimately responsible, but the athletic department can't expect good results when they are spending much less than most other P5 football programs. I don't think the offense was anywhere near as much to blame as the lack of support for the program overall.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 896433, member: 2426"] I have no problem saying that Johnson was ultimately responsible for the defensive performance. I have no problem saying that Johnson was ultimately responsible for recruiting. But are you willing to admit that GT wouldn't pay for the DCs that Johnson wanted? Are you willing to admit that Duke had double the recruiting support staff that GT had? Are you willing to admit that the TRAVEL staff for Clemson was as large as the ENTIRE football staff for GT back then? The flexbone was extremely successful as an offense. Most years GT ran the flexbone the offense was in the top 25 offensive FEI. I see the majority of the issues with recruiting and defense as being related to GT getting so far behind the rest of P5 in funding. The HC is ultimately responsible, but the athletic department can't expect good results when they are spending much less than most other P5 football programs. I don't think the offense was anywhere near as much to blame as the lack of support for the program overall. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
The reports of the TO's death have been grossly exaggerated
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top