Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
"The offense seemed completely befuddled and directionless."
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="johncu" data-source="post: 10867" data-attributes="member: 444"><p>I think most unbiased experts would consider Stanford and VT both to have top 5 defenses. They have a ton of talent, are extremely well-coached, and play with a lot of discipline. Regardless of how bad VT's offense sux, that's not what we're concerned about. We're upset because they stopped our "inferior" offense and many are comparing us to the gold standard of Oregon. Well here's a shining example of how great defenses have a way of making great offenses look mediocre. Even the mighty Oregon looked totally out of rhythm to the point that their own fans were questioning the coach (sound familiar?).</p><p></p><p>ATL1, your bias is showing. Do you honestly think that Oregon would have had the success they did with Tevin Washington at quarterback? What if they had BJ Bostic and Tony Zenon carrying the ball instead of LaMichael James and De'Anthony Thomas? Hell no! They have a great offensive scheme, for sure, but they also have Nike money, a unique brand, and more speed than any team in the country.</p><p></p><p>As far as fun to watch, that's completely a matter of opinion. Navy was my favorite non-GT team to watch for years because I enjoyed PJ's offense so much when it is executed properly. If there's any team that runs a boring offense, it's Alabama, but I don't think their fans are complaining too much about that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="johncu, post: 10867, member: 444"] I think most unbiased experts would consider Stanford and VT both to have top 5 defenses. They have a ton of talent, are extremely well-coached, and play with a lot of discipline. Regardless of how bad VT's offense sux, that's not what we're concerned about. We're upset because they stopped our "inferior" offense and many are comparing us to the gold standard of Oregon. Well here's a shining example of how great defenses have a way of making great offenses look mediocre. Even the mighty Oregon looked totally out of rhythm to the point that their own fans were questioning the coach (sound familiar?). ATL1, your bias is showing. Do you honestly think that Oregon would have had the success they did with Tevin Washington at quarterback? What if they had BJ Bostic and Tony Zenon carrying the ball instead of LaMichael James and De'Anthony Thomas? Hell no! They have a great offensive scheme, for sure, but they also have Nike money, a unique brand, and more speed than any team in the country. As far as fun to watch, that's completely a matter of opinion. Navy was my favorite non-GT team to watch for years because I enjoyed PJ's offense so much when it is executed properly. If there's any team that runs a boring offense, it's Alabama, but I don't think their fans are complaining too much about that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
"The offense seemed completely befuddled and directionless."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top