Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
The Gap... Johnson on 2017 and the Clemson/UGA gap
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eastman" data-source="post: 413789" data-attributes="member: 1390"><p>To me it seems that there are clear constraints for anyone coaching at Tech whether it is limited majors, tougher entrance requirements, difficult academics, smaller fan base, limited funds etc. because of those facts I tend to feel that CPJ does a great job. He fields tough competitive teams while doing a great job getting his players the education they came for.</p><p></p><p>What I don’t understand is the dismissal of the impact of what to me are these clear additional “headwinds” that Tech must overcome while competing at the highest level of college football. O’Leary, Ross and Dodd are brought up as if they are an objective way to support or criticize CPJ’s performance. Duke and Clemson are spoken of as if they are static entities that can be used as objective measuring sticks for comparing coaching performance with teams from decades past.</p><p>Maybe I am mistaken but I see Tech as a team that has to overcome many more obstacles than teams like the mutts yet despite that they are almost always competitive and sometimes really good. That impresses me.</p><p>In my business some sales territories are much tougher to succeed in that others. When we evaluate performance and see that someone in an inferior territory is consistently competing and even winning at times against those with far more opportunity, we know we have a great rep. That is how I see CPJ.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eastman, post: 413789, member: 1390"] To me it seems that there are clear constraints for anyone coaching at Tech whether it is limited majors, tougher entrance requirements, difficult academics, smaller fan base, limited funds etc. because of those facts I tend to feel that CPJ does a great job. He fields tough competitive teams while doing a great job getting his players the education they came for. What I don’t understand is the dismissal of the impact of what to me are these clear additional “headwinds” that Tech must overcome while competing at the highest level of college football. O’Leary, Ross and Dodd are brought up as if they are an objective way to support or criticize CPJ’s performance. Duke and Clemson are spoken of as if they are static entities that can be used as objective measuring sticks for comparing coaching performance with teams from decades past. Maybe I am mistaken but I see Tech as a team that has to overcome many more obstacles than teams like the mutts yet despite that they are almost always competitive and sometimes really good. That impresses me. In my business some sales territories are much tougher to succeed in that others. When we evaluate performance and see that someone in an inferior territory is consistently competing and even winning at times against those with far more opportunity, we know we have a great rep. That is how I see CPJ. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
The Gap... Johnson on 2017 and the Clemson/UGA gap
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top