Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
The Empty Cupboard at UGA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 251254" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>No, I don't believe that the "stars" actually mean anything. As I stated before, you can see a fully grown man like H Walker in high school and be certain that he will do well. After that level of player, you have to guess who will gain the correct weight, who will mesh with schemes, who will be able to handle being away from home, who will be able to handle the pressure of college classes, etc. The NFL spends tons of money to evaluate college players. They have many people watching all the film they can find for college players. They do psychoanalysis of college players. They do extensive background checks of college players. They do extensive physical testing of college players. Even with all of that money spent on evaluations, there are blog posts that compare the worst first round picks of each NFL team. Every team has at least one first rounder that didn't work out. After the second round, you get to many players that never make a roster. How can ANYONE believe that recruiting ranking sites with less money, no psychoanalysis, no background checks, no real physical testing, much less film, and many times more players to evaluate, can even come close to getting their "stars" correct? The ONLY thing the recruiting sites are good for are selling ads and inciting trash talk among unintelligent fans.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 251254, member: 2426"] No, I don't believe that the "stars" actually mean anything. As I stated before, you can see a fully grown man like H Walker in high school and be certain that he will do well. After that level of player, you have to guess who will gain the correct weight, who will mesh with schemes, who will be able to handle being away from home, who will be able to handle the pressure of college classes, etc. The NFL spends tons of money to evaluate college players. They have many people watching all the film they can find for college players. They do psychoanalysis of college players. They do extensive background checks of college players. They do extensive physical testing of college players. Even with all of that money spent on evaluations, there are blog posts that compare the worst first round picks of each NFL team. Every team has at least one first rounder that didn't work out. After the second round, you get to many players that never make a roster. How can ANYONE believe that recruiting ranking sites with less money, no psychoanalysis, no background checks, no real physical testing, much less film, and many times more players to evaluate, can even come close to getting their "stars" correct? The ONLY thing the recruiting sites are good for are selling ads and inciting trash talk among unintelligent fans. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
The Empty Cupboard at UGA
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top