Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
The Empty Cupboard at UGA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 251124" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>If Alabama can dismiss players who could potentially start with the mutts to open up scholarship spots for better players, I don't see how you can say that the mutts have the same level of talent.</p><p></p><p>Also, the entire reason for this thread is that the mutt fans: </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Complained last year that they have the same level of talent as Ohio State, LSU, Alabama, etc, but their coach couldn't work with them. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Now that they have the coach they wanted, they are complaining that the previous coach left them with absolutely no talent and there is no way that their preferred coach can win with them</li> </ul><p>They still have 3-4 years worth of players who "were on par with Alabama and Ohio State", from the previous coach. The only class that Richt didn't sign was the 2016 class that the new coach signed and was touted as an incredible class. The big joke about the mutt fans is that: All they needed to do was get rid of Grantham and they would win the MNC. It didn't work, so All they needed to do was get rid of Bobo and they would win the MNC. It didn't work, so All they needed to do was get rid of Richt and they would win the MNC. It appears that it hasn't worked quickly, so they make up more excuses. The actual truth is that they ARE NOT on par with Ohio State and Alabama. The mutts are in the second tier of FBS teams, not the top tier. There is no minor tweak that will win them 5 MNCs in a row.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 251124, member: 2426"] If Alabama can dismiss players who could potentially start with the mutts to open up scholarship spots for better players, I don't see how you can say that the mutts have the same level of talent. Also, the entire reason for this thread is that the mutt fans: [LIST] [*]Complained last year that they have the same level of talent as Ohio State, LSU, Alabama, etc, but their coach couldn't work with them. [*]Now that they have the coach they wanted, they are complaining that the previous coach left them with absolutely no talent and there is no way that their preferred coach can win with them [/LIST] They still have 3-4 years worth of players who "were on par with Alabama and Ohio State", from the previous coach. The only class that Richt didn't sign was the 2016 class that the new coach signed and was touted as an incredible class. The big joke about the mutt fans is that: All they needed to do was get rid of Grantham and they would win the MNC. It didn't work, so All they needed to do was get rid of Bobo and they would win the MNC. It didn't work, so All they needed to do was get rid of Richt and they would win the MNC. It appears that it hasn't worked quickly, so they make up more excuses. The actual truth is that they ARE NOT on par with Ohio State and Alabama. The mutts are in the second tier of FBS teams, not the top tier. There is no minor tweak that will win them 5 MNCs in a row. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
The Empty Cupboard at UGA
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top