Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
The dynamics of recruiting, a historical perspective
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 232099" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>Cool your jets, friend. I appreciate you. </p><p></p><p>I was replying to your post about prioritizing recruiting where you compared today to the O'Leary era as if it were just a question of prioritization. </p><p></p><p>Between then and now, the NCAA has implemented APR, or academic progress rate requirement which means that it's no longer possible, as it was earlier, to stay eligible taking classes that don't get you closer to degree completion. </p><p></p><p>So, I was saying that you can't just assert we did it before casually as if it's only a matter of priorities. </p><p></p><p>Also, it should be noted, that the year after cpj was given more flexibility in recruiting exceptions we signed a class with a large number of guys that didn't stick. So APR at Tech is a real hurdle imo. I think it took me 13 qtrs to graduate so, I'm not sure I would've made APR.</p><p></p><p>So, I wasn't addressing the question of whether GT could offer easier majors. I've said in another post that I think we should offer a practical tecnology degree which combines core classes in humanities, math, science and businesses with specializations in hvac, electronics, mechanics etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 232099, member: 195"] Cool your jets, friend. I appreciate you. I was replying to your post about prioritizing recruiting where you compared today to the O'Leary era as if it were just a question of prioritization. Between then and now, the NCAA has implemented APR, or academic progress rate requirement which means that it's no longer possible, as it was earlier, to stay eligible taking classes that don't get you closer to degree completion. So, I was saying that you can't just assert we did it before casually as if it's only a matter of priorities. Also, it should be noted, that the year after cpj was given more flexibility in recruiting exceptions we signed a class with a large number of guys that didn't stick. So APR at Tech is a real hurdle imo. I think it took me 13 qtrs to graduate so, I'm not sure I would've made APR. So, I wasn't addressing the question of whether GT could offer easier majors. I've said in another post that I think we should offer a practical tecnology degree which combines core classes in humanities, math, science and businesses with specializations in hvac, electronics, mechanics etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
The dynamics of recruiting, a historical perspective
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top