Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
The "Collins effect "........
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iceeater1969" data-source="post: 516346" data-attributes="member: 1237"><p>Well here goes the first response to your well reasoned post.</p><p> All after u and before this never addressed for request for specific comments on your numbered points of fact and conclusion as well as your request (point 8) that we be real in our value of winning verses academic compliance ( I changed to academic compliance (ncaa GR) verses supporting the SA) .</p><p></p><p>.boy these guys love to just fight.</p><p></p><p>1. We r doing well. At a recent press conf or interview Tstan said "Coach is graduating his players at 86% rate. I confirmed that rate in the NCAA graduation data base for gt football 2011.</p><p>If this NCAA data is not the right one let me know.</p><p>Agree we are doing very good compared to past and a number of others to be named after this point. We are way behind ND , Stanford, BC, Duke.</p><p>WE ARE WAY AHEAD OF uga WHO IS AT 58%.</p><p>Imo , to be at that level after the requirement for progress w penalties started in 05 is Disgraceful and Bordering Exploitive. See numbers after gt</p><p></p><p>Gt football and Gt bb below</p><p> School</p><p> year %</p><p></p><p>Gtfb</p><p>02-49%,04-55%,06-63%,08-78%,10-82%, 11-86% </p><p>Gtbb</p><p>02-38%,04-27%,06-40%,08-50%,10-80%, 11-78%</p><p>Looks like at gt both FB and BB started up dramatically at about 05.</p><p>I ask - if both fb and bb are both going up isnt that the AD laying down the law?</p><p></p><p>I ask - did Gailey have anything to do w the the fb numbers shown above or did this uptick all happen on Coaches watch..</p><p></p><p>Whoever or whatever it is, our numbers are way up!!.</p><p></p><p>I would like for us to get to 100 but there is that diminishing returns thing as u approach perfection. (8)</p><p></p><p>At my company we got engineering work because we never quit on any job (lost$$ on some ). Clients valued that certainty of completion ( we had good 4 star manager type running projects).</p><p>I THINK THE IMPROVEMENT IN GR has helped in recent recruiting and as word spreads nation wide it will pay hugh dividends in future.</p><p>The old "I got out" is still hard to do.</p><p>BUT Now it's more like a a football recruit thinks:</p><p> "If I get into gt, there is a 35% % better chance of getting a great degree there than getting a "so so" degree at uga!"</p><p>Uga</p><p>02-??,04-65%,06-82%,08-73%,10-53%,11-58%. THEY ARE GOING DOWN ! Pitiful.</p><p></p><p>I have no idea about Oleary and could careless about it.</p><p></p><p>What do we do now?</p><p>1. Recruit very conservatively and go for over 90% and hold there while we wait from impact of high GR to make us more like ND?</p><p>2. Recruit more liberally but stay near 80% while we get better athletes.</p><p>3 . Double the tutorial budget , go to 100% while getting better players now?</p><p></p><p>If tstan told GC</p><p>1. he was going to double tutorial budget,</p><p>2. but GC has to put hammer on players ( no more it is what it is),</p><p>3 he can have liberalization on commits.</p><p>GC , like a 40000 hp gas turbine, would need over speed control.</p><p></p><p>Thanks to Coach gailey , Coach, and the Past AD s for putting GC in a position to win</p><p></p><p>Looking forward to your comments..</p><p>Sorry for any grammar issues.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iceeater1969, post: 516346, member: 1237"] Well here goes the first response to your well reasoned post. All after u and before this never addressed for request for specific comments on your numbered points of fact and conclusion as well as your request (point 8) that we be real in our value of winning verses academic compliance ( I changed to academic compliance (ncaa GR) verses supporting the SA) . .boy these guys love to just fight. 1. We r doing well. At a recent press conf or interview Tstan said "Coach is graduating his players at 86% rate. I confirmed that rate in the NCAA graduation data base for gt football 2011. If this NCAA data is not the right one let me know. Agree we are doing very good compared to past and a number of others to be named after this point. We are way behind ND , Stanford, BC, Duke. WE ARE WAY AHEAD OF uga WHO IS AT 58%. Imo , to be at that level after the requirement for progress w penalties started in 05 is Disgraceful and Bordering Exploitive. See numbers after gt Gt football and Gt bb below School year % Gtfb 02-49%,04-55%,06-63%,08-78%,10-82%, 11-86% Gtbb 02-38%,04-27%,06-40%,08-50%,10-80%, 11-78% Looks like at gt both FB and BB started up dramatically at about 05. I ask - if both fb and bb are both going up isnt that the AD laying down the law? I ask - did Gailey have anything to do w the the fb numbers shown above or did this uptick all happen on Coaches watch.. Whoever or whatever it is, our numbers are way up!!. I would like for us to get to 100 but there is that diminishing returns thing as u approach perfection. (8) At my company we got engineering work because we never quit on any job (lost$$ on some ). Clients valued that certainty of completion ( we had good 4 star manager type running projects). I THINK THE IMPROVEMENT IN GR has helped in recent recruiting and as word spreads nation wide it will pay hugh dividends in future. The old "I got out" is still hard to do. BUT Now it's more like a a football recruit thinks: "If I get into gt, there is a 35% % better chance of getting a great degree there than getting a "so so" degree at uga!" Uga 02-??,04-65%,06-82%,08-73%,10-53%,11-58%. THEY ARE GOING DOWN ! Pitiful. I have no idea about Oleary and could careless about it. What do we do now? 1. Recruit very conservatively and go for over 90% and hold there while we wait from impact of high GR to make us more like ND? 2. Recruit more liberally but stay near 80% while we get better athletes. 3 . Double the tutorial budget , go to 100% while getting better players now? If tstan told GC 1. he was going to double tutorial budget, 2. but GC has to put hammer on players ( no more it is what it is), 3 he can have liberalization on commits. GC , like a 40000 hp gas turbine, would need over speed control. Thanks to Coach gailey , Coach, and the Past AD s for putting GC in a position to win Looking forward to your comments.. Sorry for any grammar issues. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
The "Collins effect "........
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top