Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
The Citadel Postgame
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 630771" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>[USER=1069]@bravejason[/USER] I'm glad you're trying to put a good face on this, but there are some other stats that weigh against it. </p><p></p><p>While 6.5 ypp is generally good, but (a) it's against a lower division team and (b) our efficiency wasn't good. Maybe without the sacks and tackles for loss, we'd have been good. Here are the game stats: <a href="https://www.espn.com/college-football/matchup?gameId=401112452" target="_blank">https://www.espn.com/college-football/matchup?gameId=401112452</a> and <a href="https://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore?gameId=401112452" target="_blank">https://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore?gameId=401112452</a> . </p><p></p><p>We were 3-9 on third down, and 0-1 on fourth. That's OK if you're otherwise converting first downs, but we weren't. We got four first downs in the first half, and six in the second. They outgained us 350 yards to 301. </p><p></p><p>Citadel had 3 sacks and 6 tackles for loss. We had 1 and 4 (and our defense was on the field twice as long, so should have had more negative plays). Lucas Johnson had a QBR of 43 and Tobias Oliver had a QBR of 74 against a team with a physical disadvantage in the secondary. </p><p></p><p>In engine terms, we've got a V8, but only two cylinders firing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 630771, member: 282"] [USER=1069]@bravejason[/USER] I'm glad you're trying to put a good face on this, but there are some other stats that weigh against it. While 6.5 ypp is generally good, but (a) it's against a lower division team and (b) our efficiency wasn't good. Maybe without the sacks and tackles for loss, we'd have been good. Here are the game stats: [URL]https://www.espn.com/college-football/matchup?gameId=401112452[/URL] and [URL]https://www.espn.com/college-football/boxscore?gameId=401112452[/URL] . We were 3-9 on third down, and 0-1 on fourth. That's OK if you're otherwise converting first downs, but we weren't. We got four first downs in the first half, and six in the second. They outgained us 350 yards to 301. Citadel had 3 sacks and 6 tackles for loss. We had 1 and 4 (and our defense was on the field twice as long, so should have had more negative plays). Lucas Johnson had a QBR of 43 and Tobias Oliver had a QBR of 74 against a team with a physical disadvantage in the secondary. In engine terms, we've got a V8, but only two cylinders firing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
The Citadel Postgame
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top