Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Targeting, without a doubt? Jimbo thinks so.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dressedcheeseside" data-source="post: 189152" data-attributes="member: 77"><p>Fwiw, I think tossing Adam for that hit was excessive, imo. The rule needs tweaking. </p><p></p><p>Here's what I'd do if I were on the rules committee. I'd propose they'd allow the replay official to review the hit and decide the severity of the penalty if one should be given. Right now, they can review it, but have to eject guys if the letter of the rule is broken. Reality is not that black and white. Sometimes the contact is incidental, sometimes it's intentional and sometimes it's unintentional, but the player in question is being reckless. </p><p></p><p>A range of penalties is appropriate, imo, kinda like the 5 yard running into the kicker as opposed to the 15 yard roughing call. Sometimes an ejection is warranted, but many times it is not.</p><p></p><p>I think the spirit of the rule is good, the exact wording, not so much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dressedcheeseside, post: 189152, member: 77"] Fwiw, I think tossing Adam for that hit was excessive, imo. The rule needs tweaking. Here's what I'd do if I were on the rules committee. I'd propose they'd allow the replay official to review the hit and decide the severity of the penalty if one should be given. Right now, they can review it, but have to eject guys if the letter of the rule is broken. Reality is not that black and white. Sometimes the contact is incidental, sometimes it's intentional and sometimes it's unintentional, but the player in question is being reckless. A range of penalties is appropriate, imo, kinda like the 5 yard running into the kicker as opposed to the 15 yard roughing call. Sometimes an ejection is warranted, but many times it is not. I think the spirit of the rule is good, the exact wording, not so much. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Targeting, without a doubt? Jimbo thinks so.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top