Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Syracuse vs. Georgia Tech
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OG-T" data-source="post: 397064" data-attributes="member: 1741"><p><strong><u>CUSE REPORT CARD</u></strong></p><p><strong>Overall</strong> — A. This game, like the Clemson game, was a more than a conference game, it's a culture/program game. One of those must-wins to increase a passionate following.</p><p><strong>Coaching</strong> — B+. He got the Defense back in line — the Cuse's shooting woes helped. AD went out with rolled ankle, and it forced Tad to short-corner; happy coincidence. One area we need serious work on is our press-break. For such a "violent-cutting" team, we seem really slow on our press-break movement. I've stated before, anything less than 10 fast break points per game (exception is Virginia) is unacceptable. For our scoring troubles, we need to find easy points, and especially since pushing the ball is a strength of Alvarado's.</p><p><strong>AD</strong> — C. Strong with 5 blocks, but he was a bit slow on the catch (quickly doubled) and with offensive rebounds and not exploding back up. He'll be ready next time.</p><p><strong>Lammers</strong> — B. Hopefully facial hair helping make him a little more of a bad boy. He seems a little more aggressive and sharp. Some of his shots still look way off, but like the trajectory of the energy. Also, subtle, but liked on a fast break how he was running wing hard and signaling for a lob (even though he didn't get). Want to see him asking — then demanding — the ball.</p><p><strong>Okogie</strong> — B+. Liked his aggressiveness. As Red mentioned, if he's on last night, he's 30+. He could be one of best rebounding guards in league with his explosion and reach — some of his boards look uber-athletic.</p><p><strong>Alston</strong> — A+. Under those conditions with news of his father, courageous.</p><p><strong>Alvarado</strong> — B-. Mostly downgraded for his shooting, BUT, he's a program changer, not because he's a 5-star; it's his attitude and drive, he's sticks his nose into any play, against any player. Cuse center, Sidibe, was reaching for a reb that everyone had conceded, but JA came from nowhere to stick his arm in and tip it away to GT. Such a great effort play that doesn't appear in box score, but dictated flow of game. He had 5 assts, too.</p><p><strong>Jackson</strong> — A-. Welcome back. Played well within himself. Strong short corner/baseline work. Clean 3pointer. Only complaint were the two missed FTs — he should be reliable at the line. Frustrating that he isn't.</p><p><strong>Others</strong> — We need a 7th and 8th player in the on-deck circle. There is no comfort with this mind-set that we're going to run with 6 players going forward. The staff needs to get Cole "some" minutes (even 3-5), and find spot duty for either Wright, or dust-off Moore for some quick time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OG-T, post: 397064, member: 1741"] [B][U]CUSE REPORT CARD[/U] Overall[/B] — A. This game, like the Clemson game, was a more than a conference game, it's a culture/program game. One of those must-wins to increase a passionate following. [B]Coaching[/B] — B+. He got the Defense back in line — the Cuse's shooting woes helped. AD went out with rolled ankle, and it forced Tad to short-corner; happy coincidence. One area we need serious work on is our press-break. For such a "violent-cutting" team, we seem really slow on our press-break movement. I've stated before, anything less than 10 fast break points per game (exception is Virginia) is unacceptable. For our scoring troubles, we need to find easy points, and especially since pushing the ball is a strength of Alvarado's. [B]AD[/B] — C. Strong with 5 blocks, but he was a bit slow on the catch (quickly doubled) and with offensive rebounds and not exploding back up. He'll be ready next time. [B]Lammers[/B] — B. Hopefully facial hair helping make him a little more of a bad boy. He seems a little more aggressive and sharp. Some of his shots still look way off, but like the trajectory of the energy. Also, subtle, but liked on a fast break how he was running wing hard and signaling for a lob (even though he didn't get). Want to see him asking — then demanding — the ball. [B]Okogie[/B] — B+. Liked his aggressiveness. As Red mentioned, if he's on last night, he's 30+. He could be one of best rebounding guards in league with his explosion and reach — some of his boards look uber-athletic. [B]Alston[/B] — A+. Under those conditions with news of his father, courageous. [B]Alvarado[/B] — B-. Mostly downgraded for his shooting, BUT, he's a program changer, not because he's a 5-star; it's his attitude and drive, he's sticks his nose into any play, against any player. Cuse center, Sidibe, was reaching for a reb that everyone had conceded, but JA came from nowhere to stick his arm in and tip it away to GT. Such a great effort play that doesn't appear in box score, but dictated flow of game. He had 5 assts, too. [B]Jackson[/B] — A-. Welcome back. Played well within himself. Strong short corner/baseline work. Clean 3pointer. Only complaint were the two missed FTs — he should be reliable at the line. Frustrating that he isn't. [B]Others[/B] — We need a 7th and 8th player in the on-deck circle. There is no comfort with this mind-set that we're going to run with 6 players going forward. The staff needs to get Cole "some" minutes (even 3-5), and find spot duty for either Wright, or dust-off Moore for some quick time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Syracuse vs. Georgia Tech
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top