Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stats models and rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 963608" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>It’s funny seeing two different stat takes in two different threads. That’s taking the raw number. Clemson is 2-2, and they’ve played FSU, Duke, FIU, and Charleston Southern.</p><p>This is the opponent-adjusted version of EPA (Defensive EPA is inverted, with a high EPA on the bottom, so scoring a lot and holding your opponent to a little is the upper-right-quadrant)</p><p>[MEDIA=twitter]1706316656689951053[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>And here is Hale posting unadjusted success rate. Maybe FIU and Charleston Southern really shift everything?</p><p>[MEDIA=twitter]1706753589295616180[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>I don’t know if they adjusted correctly for Duke and FSU (FSU isn’t that high on some of these charts). Clemson scored 66 against Charleston Southern and 48 against Florida Atlantic. They only scored 7 against Duke. They get moved down a lot when they’re adjusted for the opponent.</p><p></p><p>I think that they’re a talented team playing under their talent level. I’m not sure what’s going on with their offense—I think they brought in Riley but kept the rest of their offensive coaches and their old scheme. Unless he turns it around, this isn’t a good resume entry for Riley.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 963608, member: 282"] It’s funny seeing two different stat takes in two different threads. That’s taking the raw number. Clemson is 2-2, and they’ve played FSU, Duke, FIU, and Charleston Southern. This is the opponent-adjusted version of EPA (Defensive EPA is inverted, with a high EPA on the bottom, so scoring a lot and holding your opponent to a little is the upper-right-quadrant) [MEDIA=twitter]1706316656689951053[/MEDIA] And here is Hale posting unadjusted success rate. Maybe FIU and Charleston Southern really shift everything? [MEDIA=twitter]1706753589295616180[/MEDIA] I don’t know if they adjusted correctly for Duke and FSU (FSU isn’t that high on some of these charts). Clemson scored 66 against Charleston Southern and 48 against Florida Atlantic. They only scored 7 against Duke. They get moved down a lot when they’re adjusted for the opponent. I think that they’re a talented team playing under their talent level. I’m not sure what’s going on with their offense—I think they brought in Riley but kept the rest of their offensive coaches and their old scheme. Unless he turns it around, this isn’t a good resume entry for Riley. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stats models and rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top