Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Starting QB speculation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 740144" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>If your only concern is who gives us the best chance to win the very next game then you're not going agree with what I have to say regardless. </p><p></p><p>The reality is that the issues we had along the OL, at WR, and in the front 7 on D aren't just going away. They should be better than last year, but they will almost certainly still be major liabilities that we will face this year. Because of that the benefits of making the choice at QB now and sticking with it aren't nearly as beneficial because most likely we'll struggle with whoever is QB and it won't offset those issues. That makes the benefits of a rotation relatively more important, as we're most likely to get back to where we need by making sure we've made the right choice when the time comes that we have addressed those above issues. Hopefully by next year those issues will be small enough where having a guy who has clearly won the job will make a difference. If we never reach that point then we have bigger issues. </p><p></p><p>The important thing for the long term good of the program is to get the right choice. Not just make a choice now. If Graham starts game 1, but Gleason is the best choice, then I think it's certainly worth it to rotate the QBs some and eventually land on Gleason than to just go with Graham now. And you can sub any two names in and that will hold true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 740144, member: 2299"] If your only concern is who gives us the best chance to win the very next game then you're not going agree with what I have to say regardless. The reality is that the issues we had along the OL, at WR, and in the front 7 on D aren't just going away. They should be better than last year, but they will almost certainly still be major liabilities that we will face this year. Because of that the benefits of making the choice at QB now and sticking with it aren't nearly as beneficial because most likely we'll struggle with whoever is QB and it won't offset those issues. That makes the benefits of a rotation relatively more important, as we're most likely to get back to where we need by making sure we've made the right choice when the time comes that we have addressed those above issues. Hopefully by next year those issues will be small enough where having a guy who has clearly won the job will make a difference. If we never reach that point then we have bigger issues. The important thing for the long term good of the program is to get the right choice. Not just make a choice now. If Graham starts game 1, but Gleason is the best choice, then I think it's certainly worth it to rotate the QBs some and eventually land on Gleason than to just go with Graham now. And you can sub any two names in and that will hold true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Starting QB speculation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top