Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stansbury and Collins Dismissed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takethepoints" data-source="post: 899753" data-attributes="member: 265"><p>I've heard loads of "toxic" comments in the stands at Tech and for a long while to boot. As pointed out above, this is usually tied to losing. To Ugag and Puke especially. This, I understand; I'd rather eat SPAM then lose to those people. Oth, I'm pretty sure that this is the rule for most college football teams; most of them have mediocre (under .500) all-time records and little history of better results. Tech is different in that it <em>does</em> have a history of good results; indeed, results that most college football programs would kill for. I think this set up a problem when Paul - and Chan, for that matter - were there. Tech had consistent success and sometimes (2009, 2014) great success. The undertone among some fans became, "Why can't we do 2014 every year?" Unfortunately, many of the <strong>Big Donors™</strong> were part of that crowd and, as at many schools, that led to bad decisions. One thing we need to do is what Saban did at Bama: defang the <strong>Big Donors™</strong> and "professionalize" the football program. That will take the Hill moving in and making some decisions. We'll see about that, I suppose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takethepoints, post: 899753, member: 265"] I've heard loads of "toxic" comments in the stands at Tech and for a long while to boot. As pointed out above, this is usually tied to losing. To Ugag and Puke especially. This, I understand; I'd rather eat SPAM then lose to those people. Oth, I'm pretty sure that this is the rule for most college football teams; most of them have mediocre (under .500) all-time records and little history of better results. Tech is different in that it [I]does[/I] have a history of good results; indeed, results that most college football programs would kill for. I think this set up a problem when Paul - and Chan, for that matter - were there. Tech had consistent success and sometimes (2009, 2014) great success. The undertone among some fans became, "Why can't we do 2014 every year?" Unfortunately, many of the [B]Big Donors™[/B] were part of that crowd and, as at many schools, that led to bad decisions. One thing we need to do is what Saban did at Bama: defang the [B]Big Donors™[/B] and "professionalize" the football program. That will take the Hill moving in and making some decisions. We'll see about that, I suppose. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stansbury and Collins Dismissed
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top