Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stanford is a better program than GT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldJacketFan" data-source="post: 7747" data-attributes="member: 304"><p>Since 2000 through the 2012 season Stanford is 82-74 a winning percentage of 52.5%, Northwestern is 84-77 a winning percentage of 52.1%, Vanderbilt is 51-104 a winning percentage of 32.9%, Notre Dame is 98-63 a winning percentage of 60.8%, Michigan is 107-55 a winning percentage of 66% and Tech 102-67 a winning percentage of 60.3%.</p><p></p><p>Now there in argument to be made over the last 3 years the winning percentage of these schools indicate their programs are heading in a better direction than Tech but what period of time do you use for comparison? Total W-L record for the history of the program? 3 year? 5 year? 10 year? 20 year? Can Tech do a better job marketing itself and in recruiting? Of course it can but to think that the sky is falling is a bit much. Of the schools most often discussed as academic competitors of Tech it is undisputed that Tech's curriculum in narrower. Not complaining just stating a fact. Some of that has to do with the mission at Tech, some of has to do with the GA Board of Regents but bottom line is Tech has to work with what it as a Institution offers to its SAs and, I for one, am good with that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldJacketFan, post: 7747, member: 304"] Since 2000 through the 2012 season Stanford is 82-74 a winning percentage of 52.5%, Northwestern is 84-77 a winning percentage of 52.1%, Vanderbilt is 51-104 a winning percentage of 32.9%, Notre Dame is 98-63 a winning percentage of 60.8%, Michigan is 107-55 a winning percentage of 66% and Tech 102-67 a winning percentage of 60.3%. Now there in argument to be made over the last 3 years the winning percentage of these schools indicate their programs are heading in a better direction than Tech but what period of time do you use for comparison? Total W-L record for the history of the program? 3 year? 5 year? 10 year? 20 year? Can Tech do a better job marketing itself and in recruiting? Of course it can but to think that the sky is falling is a bit much. Of the schools most often discussed as academic competitors of Tech it is undisputed that Tech's curriculum in narrower. Not complaining just stating a fact. Some of that has to do with the mission at Tech, some of has to do with the GA Board of Regents but bottom line is Tech has to work with what it as a Institution offers to its SAs and, I for one, am good with that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stanford is a better program than GT
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top