Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Spring Game Impressions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takethepoints" data-source="post: 944013" data-attributes="member: 265"><p>I couldn't go; I got a specific invitation from my granddaughter to see her play soccer. She had two long distance shots on goal and the second almost went in. So this is just impressions from the film. And thanks for posting that link.</p><p></p><p>I think Dante is the obvious #1 RB. As said above, Felix looked ok too. Since everybody knew that the QBs weren't running, no options and it was all up to the RBs. Hard to evaluate the running game without that. At times it looked like we might be thinking about the kind of slow mesh that Wake uses. That would be nice.</p><p></p><p>It is hard to evaluate the QBs when they can't run (well, not much). All of them looked pretty good, but the Ds were limited so it becomes even harder to see who, if any, has it. One thing: Pyron is sidearming the ball on short/medium throws, sorta like Nesbitt. The coaches know best, but I'd try to stop him from doing that ASAP. Gibson also still tends to float balls to open receivers. Quit it.</p><p></p><p>I don't know why, but the TEs didn't do their jobs. For the third or fourth year in a row. Leonard is the best of them, but I was disappointed overall. Why not move Boyd over there? He's just big enough and he can <em>catch</em>. The WRs appear good enough to be useful. Rutherford, Moore, and Leary all looked pretty good. There were drops, however. Stop that.</p><p></p><p>The OL looked ok, but, again, the limits on the D made it very hard to see if they had improved enough.</p><p></p><p>The D looked ok too. The DBs were, generally, in position and played well. The DL didn't stand out, but they didn't give concern either. Yet again, the limits on the D made it hard to see what was going on with who.</p><p></p><p>Why did we mi9ss an FG? I thought we we're over that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takethepoints, post: 944013, member: 265"] I couldn't go; I got a specific invitation from my granddaughter to see her play soccer. She had two long distance shots on goal and the second almost went in. So this is just impressions from the film. And thanks for posting that link. I think Dante is the obvious #1 RB. As said above, Felix looked ok too. Since everybody knew that the QBs weren't running, no options and it was all up to the RBs. Hard to evaluate the running game without that. At times it looked like we might be thinking about the kind of slow mesh that Wake uses. That would be nice. It is hard to evaluate the QBs when they can't run (well, not much). All of them looked pretty good, but the Ds were limited so it becomes even harder to see who, if any, has it. One thing: Pyron is sidearming the ball on short/medium throws, sorta like Nesbitt. The coaches know best, but I'd try to stop him from doing that ASAP. Gibson also still tends to float balls to open receivers. Quit it. I don't know why, but the TEs didn't do their jobs. For the third or fourth year in a row. Leonard is the best of them, but I was disappointed overall. Why not move Boyd over there? He's just big enough and he can [I]catch[/I]. The WRs appear good enough to be useful. Rutherford, Moore, and Leary all looked pretty good. There were drops, however. Stop that. The OL looked ok, but, again, the limits on the D made it very hard to see if they had improved enough. The D looked ok too. The DBs were, generally, in position and played well. The DL didn't stand out, but they didn't give concern either. Yet again, the limits on the D made it hard to see what was going on with who. Why did we mi9ss an FG? I thought we we're over that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Spring Game Impressions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top