Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Some 23-24 Basketball stats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 996335" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>First off, I believe you just made the same error that you corrected yourself on? Anyways, I didn't chose Purdue because of high expectations. I chose them because they were #1 in returning minutes rank, although on second look it looks like their rank in that is 11th and for some reasons they had that column also including overall rank. It was an example to show that not all teams look nothing like the previous year due to the portal. Same could be said for Columbia, UNI, FAU, Wisconsin, Sainst Joseph's. All of those teams it would make sense to look at the previous season's results. Some of them were bad and probably ended the year bad and so you would think that would indicate low expectations. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I said that even if you wanted to not look at the previous years results you could just skip and start at looking at the roster after the overhaul. Because it really shouldn't matter. Whether you start at where the roster to end the year or after the overhaul, we have enough pieces on this team to not be clearly in the cellar. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Read what you just wrote again. You are right that he repeatedly states guys have not bought into what he and his staff are teaching. That is putting the blame squarely on the players. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I literally said that i was going to make the argument on your behalf. The conclusion of the argument was that CDS was likely to have success in year two or three. How do you read that as a position that I hold? Does that conclusion seem to fit at all with the rest of my position? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think CDS is a particularly proven HC. But the real bottom line is that I believe he is doing a bad job this year. And you're right that I seem to be a party of one in thinking the product being put on the floor isn't a result of a great coaching job.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 996335, member: 2299"] First off, I believe you just made the same error that you corrected yourself on? Anyways, I didn't chose Purdue because of high expectations. I chose them because they were #1 in returning minutes rank, although on second look it looks like their rank in that is 11th and for some reasons they had that column also including overall rank. It was an example to show that not all teams look nothing like the previous year due to the portal. Same could be said for Columbia, UNI, FAU, Wisconsin, Sainst Joseph's. All of those teams it would make sense to look at the previous season's results. Some of them were bad and probably ended the year bad and so you would think that would indicate low expectations. No, I said that even if you wanted to not look at the previous years results you could just skip and start at looking at the roster after the overhaul. Because it really shouldn't matter. Whether you start at where the roster to end the year or after the overhaul, we have enough pieces on this team to not be clearly in the cellar. Read what you just wrote again. You are right that he repeatedly states guys have not bought into what he and his staff are teaching. That is putting the blame squarely on the players. I literally said that i was going to make the argument on your behalf. The conclusion of the argument was that CDS was likely to have success in year two or three. How do you read that as a position that I hold? Does that conclusion seem to fit at all with the rest of my position? I don't think CDS is a particularly proven HC. But the real bottom line is that I believe he is doing a bad job this year. And you're right that I seem to be a party of one in thinking the product being put on the floor isn't a result of a great coaching job. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
Some 23-24 Basketball stats
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top