Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
So who leaves? Attrition.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Technut1990" data-source="post: 698025" data-attributes="member: 3774"><p>Just me but I just want to see progress. Maybe we don’t win a particular game but we’re prepared, you can see plays getting executed better, play calling is not head scratching, etc. We should win more than last year, right? I mean we just went on record that we had horrible practices because we had a team full of players that didn’t even know how to work out. We had OL that somewhere between HS and college forgot how to stand on the line of scrimmage. They’ve been beaten for a year now so God help us if they’ve not learned that yet. We got guys with the physical strength of D3 athletes, if that trying to compete that needed a couple months of weight training. We better be better than than now and the guys we recruit need to be better because that’s down right insane.</p><p></p><p>Lastly, I’m sure CGC and the AD had a conversation and it didn’t entail 5 years of floundering. 1 of 2 years of the transition is over. I got an open mind and would not be surprised we take some lumps this year but we better be better than 45-0 and getting thumped by Citadel. Year 3 better look better than years 1 & 2. No bowl game in year 3 when you only have to win 6 would raise some questions about staff competency. I don’t think we’re there but we’re not there yet.</p><p></p><p>Go Jackets! Start kicking some *** this year.</p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p>Wells missed one extra point last year, that’s the only chance he got. Now I tried to ask awhile back what was going on with him but that question offended folks. The fact remains however that when we say Techs kickers had a bad year last year it was Wells replacement who was 50%, wells wasn’t a factor positive or negative, for whatever reason.</p><p></p><p>As far as staff, no it’s not the same, especially in a transition. Any new staff has to deal with turnover, process implementation, player fitting etc.... staff gets 3-4 years, maybe more if we keep recruiting the way we did this past period. Staff ability shows itself once the team is fitted with the players they want not game to game play to play. If the kickers staff has inherited cannot perform in staffs first year its not a staff issue, it becomes one if the same kickers do the same thing two years in a row</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Technut1990, post: 698025, member: 3774"] Just me but I just want to see progress. Maybe we don’t win a particular game but we’re prepared, you can see plays getting executed better, play calling is not head scratching, etc. We should win more than last year, right? I mean we just went on record that we had horrible practices because we had a team full of players that didn’t even know how to work out. We had OL that somewhere between HS and college forgot how to stand on the line of scrimmage. They’ve been beaten for a year now so God help us if they’ve not learned that yet. We got guys with the physical strength of D3 athletes, if that trying to compete that needed a couple months of weight training. We better be better than than now and the guys we recruit need to be better because that’s down right insane. Lastly, I’m sure CGC and the AD had a conversation and it didn’t entail 5 years of floundering. 1 of 2 years of the transition is over. I got an open mind and would not be surprised we take some lumps this year but we better be better than 45-0 and getting thumped by Citadel. Year 3 better look better than years 1 & 2. No bowl game in year 3 when you only have to win 6 would raise some questions about staff competency. I don’t think we’re there but we’re not there yet. Go Jackets! Start kicking some *** this year.[/QUOTE] Wells missed one extra point last year, that’s the only chance he got. Now I tried to ask awhile back what was going on with him but that question offended folks. The fact remains however that when we say Techs kickers had a bad year last year it was Wells replacement who was 50%, wells wasn’t a factor positive or negative, for whatever reason. As far as staff, no it’s not the same, especially in a transition. Any new staff has to deal with turnover, process implementation, player fitting etc.... staff gets 3-4 years, maybe more if we keep recruiting the way we did this past period. Staff ability shows itself once the team is fitted with the players they want not game to game play to play. If the kickers staff has inherited cannot perform in staffs first year its not a staff issue, it becomes one if the same kickers do the same thing two years in a row [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
So who leaves? Attrition.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top