Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
So what did Joseph do?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LibertyTurns" data-source="post: 559381" data-attributes="member: 789"><p>Obviously GT has grounds for termination but that is not what this lawsuit’s going to be about. Joseph and her lawyer will attack every aspect of GT in an attempt to get money & they will be successful from what I can tell. My company just settled out of court with a person that was medically disqualified from working by 3 different doctors. It was cheaper to settle than go thru years of legal wrangling where the individual brought out every sliver of evidence that needed to be refuted,</p><p></p><p>Here as evidence from the other side we have:</p><p>A. Alleged unaddressed claims of Title 9 inconsistent polices over a multi-year period which allegedly were unanswered, not just unaddressed. That’s problematic.</p><p>B. You have texts, names redacted, but probably some of the same individuals claiming she was mean, etc. How do you reconcile a favorable email which is enduring evidence vs a verbal recollection. Some what problematic.</p><p>C. There did not appear to be any checking into staff emails & facebook, etc by this investigative attorney GT hired. That is very curious as it should have been ripe for damaging info on Joseph.</p><p>D. There were other independent advisors, psychologists, etc that refuted the investigator’s report. Add that to where was GT’s oversight all these years.</p><p>E. You’ve got the timing of the firing with the barrage of complaints by Joseph. A normal tactic by someone believing the hammer was coming down. However, the optics is not good.</p><p></p><p>Not anti-GT’s actions in totality, but it’s far from 1 100% to 0% case here and you’re going to be dealing with a jury that could or could not be sympathetic to a women’s claim of no support and discrimination. This one looks to me like 67% to 33% which is way to close to the magic 50% to make it a slam dunk. GT buys their way out of this. I hope they do it quickly for the sake of the Women’s Basketball team and our Athletics Department’s health. These things spawn off other side effects.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LibertyTurns, post: 559381, member: 789"] Obviously GT has grounds for termination but that is not what this lawsuit’s going to be about. Joseph and her lawyer will attack every aspect of GT in an attempt to get money & they will be successful from what I can tell. My company just settled out of court with a person that was medically disqualified from working by 3 different doctors. It was cheaper to settle than go thru years of legal wrangling where the individual brought out every sliver of evidence that needed to be refuted, Here as evidence from the other side we have: A. Alleged unaddressed claims of Title 9 inconsistent polices over a multi-year period which allegedly were unanswered, not just unaddressed. That’s problematic. B. You have texts, names redacted, but probably some of the same individuals claiming she was mean, etc. How do you reconcile a favorable email which is enduring evidence vs a verbal recollection. Some what problematic. C. There did not appear to be any checking into staff emails & facebook, etc by this investigative attorney GT hired. That is very curious as it should have been ripe for damaging info on Joseph. D. There were other independent advisors, psychologists, etc that refuted the investigator’s report. Add that to where was GT’s oversight all these years. E. You’ve got the timing of the firing with the barrage of complaints by Joseph. A normal tactic by someone believing the hammer was coming down. However, the optics is not good. Not anti-GT’s actions in totality, but it’s far from 1 100% to 0% case here and you’re going to be dealing with a jury that could or could not be sympathetic to a women’s claim of no support and discrimination. This one looks to me like 67% to 33% which is way to close to the magic 50% to make it a slam dunk. GT buys their way out of this. I hope they do it quickly for the sake of the Women’s Basketball team and our Athletics Department’s health. These things spawn off other side effects. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
So what did Joseph do?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top