Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
S&P 2019 season projections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 544435" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>I don't really care where GT is ranked in such a ranking. My objections aren't based on hurt feelings. I just object to people believing that such projections are "scientifically" based. The recruiting rankings use human based input. The factors assigned to specific areas(RB vs WR vs OL) are based on human decisions to assign more or less importance to that position. Such projections and rankings are fine for discussion starters, but they are not based on any hard science or scientific data analysis. They are simply off-season filler material.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: I don't think the author is out to get anyone in particular. I think that if you put: Alabama, Clemson, mutts, Oklahoma, Ohio State, and Michigan: in your top 10 for any "computerized" or pundit rankings, people tend to consider your rankings credible. I think people overlook how credible or scientific such things are. Things such as S&P and FEI can be used for analysis and comparisons, but they aren't scientific prediction tools.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 544435, member: 2426"] I don't really care where GT is ranked in such a ranking. My objections aren't based on hurt feelings. I just object to people believing that such projections are "scientifically" based. The recruiting rankings use human based input. The factors assigned to specific areas(RB vs WR vs OL) are based on human decisions to assign more or less importance to that position. Such projections and rankings are fine for discussion starters, but they are not based on any hard science or scientific data analysis. They are simply off-season filler material. EDIT: I don't think the author is out to get anyone in particular. I think that if you put: Alabama, Clemson, mutts, Oklahoma, Ohio State, and Michigan: in your top 10 for any "computerized" or pundit rankings, people tend to consider your rankings credible. I think people overlook how credible or scientific such things are. Things such as S&P and FEI can be used for analysis and comparisons, but they aren't scientific prediction tools. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
S&P 2019 season projections
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top