Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
Richt's gone
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Legal Jacket" data-source="post: 206570" data-attributes="member: 601"><p>Comparing coaches at the same school is comparing apples to oranges? You can't get a better comparison. Of all coaches who were there more than 2-3 seasons, Donnan is behind only Richt, Dooley, and Cunningham in terms of win percentage. Goff was historically bad. But that's the point, you can easily make an argument that Goff was bad. Donnan was good. Richt was great.</p><p></p><p>Most importantly - your own argument undoes itself. So SC, UT, and UF all struggled during Richt's tenure? Why is that? Oh yeah, because they didn't have as good of a coach as Richt.</p><p></p><p>If you want to define a "good" coach as someone who averages a 10-3 season in the SEC, goes to a BCS game once every 5 years, is top 10 every other year, and plays in the conference championship at least a third of the time, then I think we are just arguing semantics.</p><p></p><p>Also re Mizzou - kinda hard to ignore what Pinkel did from 2007 to 2011. 48-19 with three division titles. 24-14 in conference. Hard to say that is middle in the pack (that would be Pinkel's first 5 years, from 2001-2005).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Legal Jacket, post: 206570, member: 601"] Comparing coaches at the same school is comparing apples to oranges? You can't get a better comparison. Of all coaches who were there more than 2-3 seasons, Donnan is behind only Richt, Dooley, and Cunningham in terms of win percentage. Goff was historically bad. But that's the point, you can easily make an argument that Goff was bad. Donnan was good. Richt was great. Most importantly - your own argument undoes itself. So SC, UT, and UF all struggled during Richt's tenure? Why is that? Oh yeah, because they didn't have as good of a coach as Richt. If you want to define a "good" coach as someone who averages a 10-3 season in the SEC, goes to a BCS game once every 5 years, is top 10 every other year, and plays in the conference championship at least a third of the time, then I think we are just arguing semantics. Also re Mizzou - kinda hard to ignore what Pinkel did from 2007 to 2011. 48-19 with three division titles. 24-14 in conference. Hard to say that is middle in the pack (that would be Pinkel's first 5 years, from 2001-2005). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
Richt's gone
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top