Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
remaining wins....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lotta Booze" data-source="post: 755107" data-attributes="member: 4471"><p>Maybe my memory of the game is clouded by beer and wanting to push it out of mind but I don't remember us running a whole lot of hurry up. Am I mistaken? We are throwing more so that has reduced how much time gets chewed up when we throw back to back incompletes but I don't think this idea that we were running "hurry up offense" holds up. </p><p></p><p>Clemson had touchdown drives that lasted 1:39, 0:18, 0:27, and 0:31 in the first half. </p><p></p><p>That's 28 points for them that took less than 3 minutes off of the clock. Hell, 21 points that took less than a minute. </p><p></p><p>GT's inability to sustain drives was a big factor in the number of possessions. So were the turnovers, hard to bleed the clock when your drive ends after 7 seconds because of a bad snap or 0:37 seconds due to an interception. But probably more than anything was the fact that Clemson hardly had to sustain long drives to score.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lotta Booze, post: 755107, member: 4471"] Maybe my memory of the game is clouded by beer and wanting to push it out of mind but I don't remember us running a whole lot of hurry up. Am I mistaken? We are throwing more so that has reduced how much time gets chewed up when we throw back to back incompletes but I don't think this idea that we were running "hurry up offense" holds up. Clemson had touchdown drives that lasted 1:39, 0:18, 0:27, and 0:31 in the first half. That's 28 points for them that took less than 3 minutes off of the clock. Hell, 21 points that took less than a minute. GT's inability to sustain drives was a big factor in the number of possessions. So were the turnovers, hard to bleed the clock when your drive ends after 7 seconds because of a bad snap or 0:37 seconds due to an interception. But probably more than anything was the fact that Clemson hardly had to sustain long drives to score. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
remaining wins....
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top