Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Recruiting.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 535906" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>I appreciate that on this topic, as many others here lately, people can be sensitive and defensive on both sides. Not every pro-CGC post is anti-CPJ, and not every question is anti-CGC.</p><p></p><p>None of us knows for sure what actually happens that has led to undersigning in the past. IIuc, CPJ was having conversations with guys to get a measure on early attrition and attempted to sign to that number. For example, 4 guys with eligibility apparently chose to participate in Sr Day, but I don't know if all were on scholarship.</p><p></p><p>Sometimes guys with eligibility graduate, and are not seen as contributors for the next year, and their scholarship is not renewed. I don't see that as processing. </p><p></p><p>From both of these situations, you know an actual number of scholarships available greater than those losing eligibility. </p><p></p><p>Signing to that number is not oversigning.</p><p></p><p>However, sometimes guys who don't fit into either situation-- because they haven't graduated and plan on coming back--make a different decision after Spring.</p><p></p><p>Counting on this kind of attrition leads to what most call oversigning. It requires reducing the roster number before Fall camp. This is what the factories do, iiuc.</p><p></p><p>So, I think it's a fair question to ask whether people are for or against this practice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 535906, member: 195"] I appreciate that on this topic, as many others here lately, people can be sensitive and defensive on both sides. Not every pro-CGC post is anti-CPJ, and not every question is anti-CGC. None of us knows for sure what actually happens that has led to undersigning in the past. IIuc, CPJ was having conversations with guys to get a measure on early attrition and attempted to sign to that number. For example, 4 guys with eligibility apparently chose to participate in Sr Day, but I don't know if all were on scholarship. Sometimes guys with eligibility graduate, and are not seen as contributors for the next year, and their scholarship is not renewed. I don't see that as processing. From both of these situations, you know an actual number of scholarships available greater than those losing eligibility. Signing to that number is not oversigning. However, sometimes guys who don't fit into either situation-- because they haven't graduated and plan on coming back--make a different decision after Spring. Counting on this kind of attrition leads to what most call oversigning. It requires reducing the roster number before Fall camp. This is what the factories do, iiuc. So, I think it's a fair question to ask whether people are for or against this practice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Recruiting.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top