Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Recruiting Comparison Across Years
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ilovetheoption" data-source="post: 61142" data-attributes="member: 1414"><p>So, the basic idea that i'm putting forward is that a staff offers their ery top priorities early, and gives them chances to commit, when some of those do not commit, they move on to their next lower guys, and so on and so forth.</p><p></p><p>With is idea, it can be deduced that the guys who are signed earlier in teh recruiting process are likely guys the staff had higher on their lists than guys who signed later in the classes. There are, of course, exceptions, but I think across broad data, it probably holds true.</p><p></p><p>With this in mind:</p><p></p><p>On this date</p><p>The 2015 class has </p><p>14 Commits</p><p></p><p>The 2014 Class had</p><p>11 Commits</p><p></p><p>The 2013 Class had</p><p>10 Commits</p><p></p><p>The class of 2012 had</p><p>6 Commits</p><p></p><p>The class of 2011 had</p><p>6 Commits</p><p></p><p>The class of 201o had</p><p>8 Commits</p><p></p><p>The class of 2009 had</p><p>9 commits</p><p></p><p>The class of 2008 had</p><p>6</p><p></p><p></p><p>So, last year was the best early recruiting results you guys have had since coach johnson has gotten her. This year is even better. It seem to me that recruiting is likely trending upward, at leastt in terms of "getting the guys the staff REALLY wants to commit, and not being forced down the list"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ilovetheoption, post: 61142, member: 1414"] So, the basic idea that i'm putting forward is that a staff offers their ery top priorities early, and gives them chances to commit, when some of those do not commit, they move on to their next lower guys, and so on and so forth. With is idea, it can be deduced that the guys who are signed earlier in teh recruiting process are likely guys the staff had higher on their lists than guys who signed later in the classes. There are, of course, exceptions, but I think across broad data, it probably holds true. With this in mind: On this date The 2015 class has 14 Commits The 2014 Class had 11 Commits The 2013 Class had 10 Commits The class of 2012 had 6 Commits The class of 2011 had 6 Commits The class of 201o had 8 Commits The class of 2009 had 9 commits The class of 2008 had 6 So, last year was the best early recruiting results you guys have had since coach johnson has gotten her. This year is even better. It seem to me that recruiting is likely trending upward, at leastt in terms of "getting the guys the staff REALLY wants to commit, and not being forced down the list" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Recruiting Comparison Across Years
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top